[windows2000] Re: Regedit vs. Regedt32
- From: "Sullivan, Glenn" <GSullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 07:11:56 -0400
I'm just playing with this for the first time (and I agree, it is FAST!),
but here's another choice that I just saw from Serdar Yegulalp's Win2K Power
Users newsletter (available at http://www.win2kpowerusers.com/):
<---------------Snip------------->
Shareware: Resplendent Registry
Reader JW passed along word of a program called Resplendent Registry -- a
very nice replacement for REGEDIT/REGEDT32. There's two versions of the
program -- a full $44.95 version and a freeware version with less features.
The
best part of the program is its speed -- according to JW, "I did a search on
Symantec (have Norton AV 2002 installed). My registry is 22mb. 77,950k
keys
were searched, producing 181 keyname matches, 15 value name matches and 466
data matches. All in 8 seconds!" The program can be had from
http://www.resplendence.com/download and is certainly worth a peek if you
constantly find
yourself up to your wrists in Registry keys.
<---------------Snip------------->
Give it a shot. Standard "Don't-shoot-the-messenger" disclaimer applies...
Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I MCDBA
David Clark Company Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ray at home [mailto:listray@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 7:43 PM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Re: Regedit vs. Regedt32
I missed this whole thread since I wasn't at work today. Damn. I have
some thoughts on regedit and regedt32. I'm really angered that there is
no separate regedit and regedt32 in XP anymore. I mean, I usually used
regedit in 2000 unless I needed the regedt32 functionality. But, I
would also use regedt32 whenever I had to connect to two registries at
the same time and do some comparing of the two. Now in XP since there
is only one registry editor, it's a real PITA to look at two registry
locations at the same time. I find myself terminal servicing into
servers just to use their regedits whenever I need to look at two places
at once. I hate that. I'm pretty damn disappointed, and I wish I could
launch more than one instance of regedit or regedt32. I don't know why
those programs don't allow multiple instances. I mean, it's not like
they lock the registry while they're open or anything like that. It
doesn't make sense. Maybe someone knows of a way...
Ray at home
>-----Original Message-----
>From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>I'm glad you posted that! :-) I was just checking that myself
>and it is the
>same program using either name!
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jim Hathaway
>>Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:53 AM
>>To: 'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
>>Subject: [windows2000] Re: Regedit vs. Regedt32
>>
>>
>>
>>Actually they have . . . in Windows XP, regedit and regedt32,
>bring up the
>>same viewer window with all of the same options available.
>>
>>J
>>
==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
Other related posts:
