I missed this whole thread since I wasn't at work today. Damn. I have some thoughts on regedit and regedt32. I'm really angered that there is no separate regedit and regedt32 in XP anymore. I mean, I usually used regedit in 2000 unless I needed the regedt32 functionality. But, I would also use regedt32 whenever I had to connect to two registries at the same time and do some comparing of the two. Now in XP since there is only one registry editor, it's a real PITA to look at two registry locations at the same time. I find myself terminal servicing into servers just to use their regedits whenever I need to look at two places at once. I hate that. I'm pretty damn disappointed, and I wish I could launch more than one instance of regedit or regedt32. I don't know why those programs don't allow multiple instances. I mean, it's not like they lock the registry while they're open or anything like that. It doesn't make sense. Maybe someone knows of a way... Ray at home >-----Original Message----- >From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > >I'm glad you posted that! :-) I was just checking that myself >and it is the >same program using either name! > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jim Hathaway >>Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:53 AM >>To: 'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' >>Subject: [windows2000] Re: Regedit vs. Regedt32 >> >> >> >>Actually they have . . . in Windows XP, regedit and regedt32, >bring up the >>same viewer window with all of the same options available. >> >>J >> ================================== To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation mode or view archives use the below link. http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm