[windows2000] Re: Exchange 2003 or 2007
- From: "Ray Costanzo" <ray@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:26:33 -0500
Thanks Greg. This Zimbra - can it be installed on WS 2003? It seems to be
for Linux only, as far as Zimbra Server goes.
Ray
From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg Reese
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 11:01 PM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Re: Exchange 2003 or 2007
Zimbra. Take a look at Zimbra. Perfect for at home and a few mailboxes.
Hell, perfect for a lot of enterprises too.
beyond that, go with 07. 03 will be obsolete soon enough. May as well bite
the bullet and learn it now at home rather than on the job in front of
everyone.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Ray Costanzo <ray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi list,
I'm working on setting up a new domain at home, and I'm not going to stick
with Exchange 5.5 anymore. Do I want to install 2003 or 2007 though? I'm
usually one to want to run the latest things, but I don't know that it's
really necessary for Exchange. The main things that I'm after are having
the ability to use IMAP clients and to have a decent Outlook Web Access
experience. If Exchange 2007 requires a lot of knowledge to install that I
don't have, I won't mind going with 2003. For that matter, I wouldn't mind
going with 2000 either. But, are there any key differences between 2003 and
2007 that I might find useful, as just a home user with a handful of
mailboxes?
Thanks,
Ray
*****************************
New Site from The Kenzig Group!
Windows Vista Links, list options
and info are available at:
http://www.VistaPop.com
*****************************
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
Other related posts:
