[tor] Re: Rokabear, Icelandic Hosting for Tor
- From: Julian Wissmann <julianwissmann@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: torservers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:46:22 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I agree with you.
One of the known shortcomings of Tor is, that through analysis of traffic going
into the network and traffic coming out connections could be tracked based on
timing. This is probably a rather theoretical approach, but it is possible.
Geographical spreading will help a lot to render this approach rather useless,
because it diminishes the likelyhood of entry point and exit being in one
network.
Julian
- --
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
Will Smith <nood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb:
Hello again all, Sorry for the absent communication but I finally caught up on
all the email. I specifically was interested in running a node out of Iceland
because there didn't seem to be any there yet. They also seem to be going
through a political upheaval that might lead to a good hosting environment.
Personally I notice that tor nodes suffer from a disturbing lack of geographic
disparity. I'm also looking into places that fit my criterion major submarine
cable connection hubs, such as Argentina. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong
but I feel this is the best way to gain WORLD-wide acceptance/recognition of
tor before countries can begin to legislate against hosting exit nodes. These
are just my thoughts of course. - -nood - -------- Original Message --------
From: raidz <admin@xxxxxxxxx> Apparently from: torservers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <torservers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [tor] Re: Rokabear, Icelandic Hosting
for Tor Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:07:21 -0800 > I might ha
ve come
in late on this thread but what is the reason you > guys are looking into
hosting in Iceland? Is it their connectivity as a > middle point between the EU
and US or their laws/policies? I have heard > that bandwidth there is not cheap
(yet). > > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:56:42 +0100, Moritz Bartl wrote: > > Hi, > >
> > On 18.02.2011 07:13, Klaus Layer wrote: > >> spoken at length with one of
the admins at 1984 and I feel like we > >> could > >> throttle the node
ourselves and they could monitor externally and > >> just shut it > >> down if
we exceed a previously agreed upon limit. > > > > I would rather go with
thordc.is. It should be no problem to start > > with > > their cheapest VPS for
25€ monthly and pay 12€ per Mbps. > > > > I don't know what prices they offered
at 1984.is, but their default > > VPSes include only 150GB traffic.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: APG v1.0.8
iQJIBAEBCAAyBQJNZTndKxxKdWxpYW4gV2lzc21hbm4gPGp1bGlhbndpc3NtYW5u
QGdtYWlsLmNvbT4ACgkQtmUkkNgo0q1N9RAApD5OS/QSW2n46tbaTZa01xdZWPuY
A3gmSucdynhRB2vKmzeYzkKP6kGSLrZmkBwRtozqrCP7V4lym9tJqBhPV2genhsb
uSIiTMDwQ3qQ/xtog+odw6Ra8yATnHH4xL6lpVBobKSMEtGjg4BOsmAlX7ppJ57A
9fy5icE43CUkrGdpC7dTJmAD7duAJXbwrRKIXitB79EPbbLIdj4lnv9VtZHcHdlY
STVVnv3ihcFr6OAZINsq9D9hkRg9cBZQTLUIzjYKRYhHB3ojuDtseurNzmDkWWmQ
QYBhFH1QUMBsEQI4zX2+jx9z7oicTvIqaUwKB1+OHT9k2upEJRY5gmOnlZpgVvo5
slfraTYCkgMe0GnTc8n+LaM+d2N8ObOQsA+/bA+6riHva6Hi/kVDEayfHtL5TkAV
shGrl9BmaTEoz3Me1clMfZLjV9pQxMhbde8qYkIdMdY5VDCisQzSjeupSBtLWUZK
8Mnn73tNut/D5JGtuuVMu7IwYo4v+ylsO9U/36qROls5JU/nUlbFmgxfoUTR8YC5
CJ0bK5LMuCu/zt+3GDYiTgmMUzOfvvuEsl6gsiCthhZCn+mGF6xXpT+u6m9dR9S7
f4rW0rxqUBzHkGzrZAbX/DUGnBpAVhh3SLtNwTN3YVZu13MQYPOROO40OIo8LE3I
2UQSbf5WoEvw628= =3bIn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
