[tor] Re: Rokabear, Icelandic Hosting for Tor

  • From: "Will Smith" <nood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: torservers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 01:30:23 -0500

Hello again all,
Sorry for the absent communication but I finally caught up on all the email. I 
specifically was interested in running a node out of Iceland because there 
didn't seem to be any there yet. They also seem to be going through a political 
upheaval that might lead to a good hosting environment. Personally I notice 
that tor nodes suffer from a disturbing lack of geographic disparity. I'm also 
looking into places that fit my criterion major submarine cable connection 
hubs, such as Argentina. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong but I feel this 
is the best way to gain WORLD-wide acceptance/recognition of tor before 
countries can begin to legislate against hosting exit nodes.
These are just my thoughts of course.

-------- Original Message --------
From: raidz <admin@xxxxxxxxx>
Apparently from: torservers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <torservers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [tor] Re: Rokabear, Icelandic Hosting for Tor
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:07:21 -0800

>  I might have come in late on this thread but what is the reason you
>  guys are looking into hosting in Iceland? Is it their connectivity as a 
>  middle point between the EU and US or their laws/policies? I have heard 
>  that bandwidth there is not cheap (yet).
>  On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:56:42 +0100, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 18.02.2011 07:13, Klaus Layer wrote:
> >> spoken at length with one of the admins at 1984 and I feel like we
> >> could
> >> throttle the node ourselves and they could monitor externally and
> >> just shut it
> >> down if we exceed a previously agreed upon limit.
> >
> > I would rather go with thordc.is. It should be no problem to start
> > with
> > their cheapest VPS for 25€ monthly and pay 12€ per Mbps.
> >
> > I don't know what prices they offered at 1984.is, but their default
> > VPSes include only 150GB traffic.

Other related posts: