1 weird app. running the exe on another server instead of installing on each server. they just point a shortcut to \\server\path\exe and drop it in everyone's profile. i think installing it on the servers would help. they are running 4.5 advanced. no mem or cpu goodies. On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Steve Snyder <kwajalein@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > any weirdo apps? memory opt enabled? ctfmon killed? > > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Greg Reese <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> these are ibm x336, >> >> dual 3ghz processors, 4bg ram, but they fall apart at 20 users. w2k3 r2. >> sp2. ps 4.5 adv. >> >> they think they should get more users per server. so do i. >> >> i am suspicious of the app setup on one of the apps. and they have a lot >> of symantec junk installed. plus all the tricerat stuff. simplify >> profiles, printing, reliability etc. >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 9:20 PM, <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> >>> Exactly, some blades for example do this just as is done on lower end >>> desktops with integrated video chipsets...... >>> >>> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From*: "Joe Shonk" <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> >>> *Date*: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:14:11 -0700 >>> *To*: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> *Subject*: [THIN] Re: ram >>> >>> Because the system is sucking up a bunch of it before the OS starts >>> (PCI-X, video, etc)… You can get some of it back by using the /PAE switch >>> (yes, even on standard) to map that memory back. >>> >>> >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On >>> Behalf Of *Greg Reese >>> *Sent:* Sunday, August 31, 2008 7:01 PM >>> *To:* Thin >>> *Subject:* [THIN] ram >>> >>> >>> >>> why would a server have 4096mb of ram installed but only report 3455mb >>> installed? i am looking over some servers for a friend of mine and this >>> seems odd. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >