[THIN] Re: ram
- From: "Greg Reese" <gareese@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:23:58 -0500
these are ibm x336,
dual 3ghz processors, 4bg ram, but they fall apart at 20 users. w2k3 r2.
sp2. ps 4.5 adv.
they think they should get more users per server. so do i.
i am suspicious of the app setup on one of the apps. and they have a lot of
symantec junk installed. plus all the tricerat stuff. simplify profiles,
printing, reliability etc.
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 9:20 PM, <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Exactly, some blades for example do this just as is done on lower end
> desktops with integrated video chipsets......
>
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
> ------------------------------
> *From*: "Joe Shonk" <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Date*: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:14:11 -0700
> *To*: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject*: [THIN] Re: ram
>
> Because the system is sucking up a bunch of it before the OS starts
> (PCI-X, video, etc)… You can get some of it back by using the /PAE switch
> (yes, even on standard) to map that memory back.
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Greg Reese
> *Sent:* Sunday, August 31, 2008 7:01 PM
> *To:* Thin
> *Subject:* [THIN] ram
>
>
>
> why would a server have 4096mb of ram installed but only report 3455mb
> installed? i am looking over some servers for a friend of mine and this
> seems odd.
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
