Security is a concern, and that's why I want to use Secure Gateway, I want it for protocol enforcement. At the same time, I don't need to do endpoint analysis or anything like that as I am going from a trusted to semi untrusted network. 2009/9/30 Mike Semon <msemon@xxxxxxx> > If security isn’t a big concern then Secure Gateway will probably work > just fine. I have a client that is using Secure Gateway with a small number > of users and it works fine for their needs. The Citrix documentation says > that Secure Gateway does not scale well and for large number of users and > recommends Access Gateway. Whether that is true or not I have not done a > comparison on performance. > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *Berny Stapleton > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2009 6:43 AM > *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [THIN] Re: latency of CSG vs AG > > > > I understand the code is 10 years old, the only thing for me is that I know > it inside out and backwards, and the fact that it hasn't been heavily > modified in that amount of time means to me that it's going to be pretty > light and might run faster... > > All I am after is something to do protocol enforcement, this isn't going > out over the internet and was thinking that the Access Gateway stuff might > be a bit more bloated and therefore slower.... > > Berny > > 2009/9/30 Mike Semon <msemon@xxxxxxx> > > Citrix Secure Gateway is 10 yrs old technology and is essentially an ICA > proxy. Access Gateway is a SSL/VPN appliance > > And should perform better and be more secure. > > > > Mike > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *Berny Stapleton > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 29, 2009 1:44 AM > *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [THIN] latency of CSG vs AG > > > > Has anyone done any latency testing on Citrix Secure Gateway vs the Access > Gateway? > > I am going to be running both on dedicated hardware.. > > Any suggestions? > > Berny > > >