[THIN] Re: latency of CSG vs AG
- From: "Mike Semon" <msemon@xxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:16:08 -0500
If security isn't a big concern then Secure Gateway will probably work just
fine. I have a client that is using Secure Gateway with a small number of
users and it works fine for their needs. The Citrix documentation says that
Secure Gateway does not scale well and for large number of users and
recommends Access Gateway. Whether that is true or not I have not done a
comparison on performance.
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Berny Stapleton
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 6:43 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: latency of CSG vs AG
I understand the code is 10 years old, the only thing for me is that I know
it inside out and backwards, and the fact that it hasn't been heavily
modified in that amount of time means to me that it's going to be pretty
light and might run faster...
All I am after is something to do protocol enforcement, this isn't going out
over the internet and was thinking that the Access Gateway stuff might be a
bit more bloated and therefore slower....
Berny
2009/9/30 Mike Semon <msemon@xxxxxxx>
Citrix Secure Gateway is 10 yrs old technology and is essentially an ICA
proxy. Access Gateway is a SSL/VPN appliance
And should perform better and be more secure.
Mike
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Berny Stapleton
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 1:44 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] latency of CSG vs AG
Has anyone done any latency testing on Citrix Secure Gateway vs the Access
Gateway?
I am going to be running both on dedicated hardware..
Any suggestions?
Berny
Other related posts: