[THIN] New Citrix receiver For iPhone or iPad supports web interface without csg or ag

  • From: Warren Simondson <caditc@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:43:37 +1100

Just released new Citrix receiver for iPad/iPhone. You can now access apps via 
web interface using 
Citrix receiver without cag or ag in front of it. Not very secure but certainly 
very handy.


-- 
Warren Simondson

Ctrl-Alt-Del IT Consultancy Pty Ltd

Website: http://www.ctrl-alt-del.com.au








On Fri, Dec 17th, 2010 at 7:26 PM, James Scanlon 
<James.Scanlon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We have troubleshooted this to APPSENSE. When all three products (AM, EM
> And PM are enabled) the server doubles users logons from 14s to around
> 30, and progressivly gets worse until the server completely crashes
> around 45 users.
> Stopping any of the three services of appsense relieves the issue.
> Stopping appsense completely sees the server behave as we would expect
> sub 15second logons, for over 100 users, instant launching of programs.
> Further investigation continues and will update the list when we have
> more info...
> Thanks to all for your input.
>  
> J
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of James Scanlon
> Sent: 14 December 2010 08:08
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: XenServer Slowdown
> 
> 
> The operating system is barely doing anything during this time from a
> perfmon point of view... the stats all slowly increase as expected but
> its like hitting a glass ceiling at present with no way of
> capturing.....
>  
>  
> at 40 users (and things stable-ish)
>  
> 10GB of ram used
> 5%-20% CPU at the most
> Everything mostly idle.
> No disk queues - and have never gone above 1 (according to perfmon)
>  
> Apparently the array controllers are set at 75% write and 25% read - if
> that makes any difference (would have thought only if the queues were
> high....???)
>  
> J
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Joe Shonk
> Sent: 13 December 2010 17:50
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: XenServer Slowdown
> 
> 
> 
> What does you disk i/o look like with 45-50 users?
> 
>  
> 
> Joe
> 
>  
> 
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of James Scanlon
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 10:29 AM
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: XenServer Slowdown
> 
>  
> 
> the xenapp servers are all physical machines. no xenserver involved.
> 
> The servers themselves have 146GB Mirrored SAS
> 
> Network is dual 1GB Physical NICS teamed with HP software
> 
> The ZDC is a virtual on vmware........?
> 
> Its 4 Physical servers all having exactly the same issues..... :(
> 
>  
> 
> Very much appreciate any further input!!!
> 
> Thank you for your reply :)
> 
>  
> 
> James
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Joe Shonk
> Sent: 13 December 2010 17:22
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: XenServer Slowdown
> 
> Hello,
> 
>  
> 
> What version of XenServer are you running and how many VMs?  Did you
> select the Optimize for XenApp under each VM?  What does you disk
> subsystem and network look like?
> 
>  
> 
> Joe
> 
>  
> 
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of James Scanlon
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 2:54 AM
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: XenServer Slowdown
> 
>  
> 
> Everyone,
> 
>  
> 
> After the applicaiton of all the below listed hotfixes and a number of
> other MS hotfixes related to terminal services
> 
> we are still in a position of grief with these servers.
> 
>  
> 
> We are no longer experiencing a slow down or crash over time more what
> we would call a significant slow down for the amount of users vs
> hardware on the servers.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> DL380 G6, 36GB of Physical Ram (34 available to windows)
> 
> Dual Intel Xeon 2.8, 16 Cores, x5560
> 
> Windows 2008 SP2
> 
>  
> 
> Problem
> 
> We are seeing server instability around 50 users, 45 seems to be the
> limit.
> 
> With servers of such huge specs does any list legend have any further
> ideas what we could be doing wrong?
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Any suggesitons would be very much appreciated!!!!!
> 
> Thank s in advance for any assistance or even reading this 
> 
>  
> 
> Cheers
> 
> James
> 
>  
> 
> OTHER INFO
> 
>  
> 
> Could it be BIOS settings?
> 
>  
> 
> Intel hyperthreading options - enabled
> intel Virtualisation technology - enabled
> no execute memory protection (dep) - on
> Intel vt-d - enabled
> Intel turbo boost technology - enabled
> processor core disable - no
> 
>  
> 
> Performance Stats
> 
> #users
> 
>          logon time(seconds)
> 
>       
> 
>       
> 
> 20
> 
> 25
> 
>       
> 
> 40
> 
> 78
> 
>       
> 
> 48
> 
>  Error: server busy processing another logon.
> 
>                                                       
> 50
> 
> 56
> 
>   5s to launch word(1st time) - 2s 2nd time
> 
>                                               
> 60
> 
> 75
> 
>   7.5s to launch word (1st time) - 4.3 2nd time
> 
>                                               
> 70
> 
> 255
> 
>   11s to launch word (1st time) - 5s 2nd time
> 
> Lost graphics
> 
> RDP logon = 75s.
> 
>       
> All users logged off. 1st user logon = back to 25s
> 
>                                                               
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of James Scanlon
> Sent: 18 November 2010 13:32
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: XenServer Slowdown
> 
> Right - further info
> 
>  
> 
> Quite a few of the below are not applied - have an action task to review
> all and install requried and test after each one... thanks again Carl
> 
>  
> 
> looking into ctx hotfixes but seems we have x64_FR3_Enabled applied to
> all... (is there something similar for windows 2003 32bit server in the
> same farm?)
> 
>  
> 
> thanks again everyone
> 
>  
> 
> James
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Carl Stalhood
> Sent: 17 November 2010 19:07
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: XenServer Slowdown
> 
> There are a ton of hotfixes for Windows 2008 64-bit post SP2. Here's my
> collection. All of these are related to TS in some way. Some of them
> directly fix performance problems.
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/983533  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2028453  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2028484  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2059743  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2065362  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2213578  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2231728  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2251177  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2261826  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2272153  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2281477  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2300745  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2414013  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2444213  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/949538  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/955365  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/956438  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/958089  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/958596  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/960568  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/967113  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/967933  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/968074  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/968358  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/968930  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/968967  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/968995  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/969290  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/969837  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/969851  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/969940  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/969972  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/970603  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/970689  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/970840  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/970910  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/970911  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/970964  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971253  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971271  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971338  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971347  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971370  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971427  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971438  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971589  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/972495  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/972596  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/972600  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/972904  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/973062  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/973521  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/973554  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/973744  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/974103  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/974195  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/974266  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/974825  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/975848  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976036  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976038  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976110  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976520  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976538  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976674  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977225  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977263  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977269  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977389  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977401  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977541  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977585  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977611  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977675  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977686  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/978042  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/978829  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/978927  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/979241  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/979425  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/979548  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/979557  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/980248  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/980356  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/980380  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/980568  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/980663  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/980945  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981062  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981369  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981462  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981500  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981704  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981891  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981964  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/982051  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/982303  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/982334  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/982416  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/982606  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/982931  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/983237  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/983385  
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/983458   
> 
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/983533 
> 
>  
> 
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:27 AM, James Scanlon
> <James.Scanlon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> We are having speed issues with out XenServers
> 
> Brand New builds
> 
> Deployed with Altiris
> 
> Xenserver 5.0
> 
> Windows 2008 Standard 64bit
> 
>  
> 
> ______________________________________
> 
>  
> 
> C. Hoare & Co. is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services
> Authority with registration no. 122093. The FSA's address is 25, The
> North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 5HS.
> 
> Registered in England no. 240822. Registered office 37 Fleet St, London,
> EC4P 4DQ
> 
>  
> 
> Confidentiality Disclaimer:
> 
> This message and attachments are confidential and may be privileged, and
> are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s). If you are not
> the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this document
> is unauthorised. Information transmitted by email may be intercepted,
> lost, destroyed, corrupted or delayed and as a result, C. Hoare & Co. do
> not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions in the contents of
> this message. If you would like to confirm the contents of this email,
> please request a hard copy version.
> 
>  
> 
> If the contents of this message are of a personal nature, the email will
> have been sent in a personal capacity and not on behalf of C. Hoare &
> Co.
> 
>  
> 
> Monitoring/Viruses:
> 
> C. Hoare & Co. may monitor all incoming and outgoing emails in line with
> current legislation. Although emails are screened for viruses, C. Hoare
> & Co. cannot guarantee that any transmissions will be virus free.
> 
> ________________________________________
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or 
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
Follow ThinList on Twitter
http://twitter.com/thinlist
************************************************

Other related posts: