[THIN] Re: New Citrix receiver For iPhone or iPad supports web interface without csg or ag
- From: Magnus Hjorleifsson <magnus@xxxxxxxx>
- To: "thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:50:49 -0500
We use Agee as well. Seems to be working for us so far (thank god). We have
about 500 iPad users and we advised them not to upgrade until they her back
from IT to avoid issues
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 17, 2010, at 9:36, Michael Pardee <pardeemp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The new release for iPad does not work for us. Unexpected error. Looking at
> the forums we are not alone. Also wipes out all previously configured options
> on the iPad. We use access gateway enterprise edition. Just a heads up in
> case others start receiving calls from people with ipads that can't get in.
>
> On Dec 17, 2010 9:32 AM, "Greg Reese" <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I don't see where there is anything newer for iPhone beyond the 4.0.1
> > version released back in August.
> >
> > Greg
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Warren Simondson <caditc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Just released new Citrix receiver for iPad/iPhone. You can now access apps
> >> via web interface using
> >> Citrix receiver without cag or ag in front of it. Not very secure but
> >> certainly very handy.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Warren Simondson
> >>
> >> Ctrl-Alt-Del IT Consultancy Pty Ltd
> >>
> >> Website: http://www.ctrl-alt-del.com.au
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 17th, 2010 at 7:26 PM, James Scanlon <
> >> James.Scanlon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> > We have troubleshooted this to APPSENSE. When all three products (AM, EM
> >> > And PM are enabled) the server doubles users logons from 14s to around
> >> > 30, and progressivly gets worse until the server completely crashes
> >> > around 45 users.
> >> > Stopping any of the three services of appsense relieves the issue.
> >> > Stopping appsense completely sees the server behave as we would expect
> >> > sub 15second logons, for over 100 users, instant launching of programs.
> >> > Further investigation continues and will update the list when we have
> >> > more info...
> >> > Thanks to all for your input.
> >> >
> >> > J
> >> >
> >> > ________________________________
> >> >
> >> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> >> > Behalf Of James Scanlon
> >> > Sent: 14 December 2010 08:08
> >> > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Subject: [THIN] Re: XenServer Slowdown
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The operating system is barely doing anything during this time from a
> >> > perfmon point of view... the stats all slowly increase as expected but
> >> > its like hitting a glass ceiling at present with no way of
> >> > capturing.....
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > at 40 users (and things stable-ish)
> >> >
> >> > 10GB of ram used
> >> > 5%-20% CPU at the most
> >> > Everything mostly idle.
> >> > No disk queues - and have never gone above 1 (according to perfmon)
> >> >
> >> > Apparently the array controllers are set at 75% write and 25% read - if
> >> > that makes any difference (would have thought only if the queues were
> >> > high....???)
> >> >
> >> > J
> >> >
> >> > ________________________________
> >> >
> >> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> >> > Behalf Of Joe Shonk
> >> > Sent: 13 December 2010 17:50
> >> > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Subject: [THIN] Re: XenServer Slowdown
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > What does you disk i/o look like with 45-50 users?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Joe
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> >> > Behalf Of James Scanlon
> >> > Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 10:29 AM
> >> > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Subject: [THIN] Re: XenServer Slowdown
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > the xenapp servers are all physical machines. no xenserver involved.
> >> >
> >> > The servers themselves have 146GB Mirrored SAS
> >> >
> >> > Network is dual 1GB Physical NICS teamed with HP software
> >> >
> >> > The ZDC is a virtual on vmware........?
> >> >
> >> > Its 4 Physical servers all having exactly the same issues..... :(
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Very much appreciate any further input!!!
> >> >
> >> > Thank you for your reply :)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > James
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ________________________________
> >> >
> >> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> >> > Behalf Of Joe Shonk
> >> > Sent: 13 December 2010 17:22
> >> > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Subject: [THIN] Re: XenServer Slowdown
> >> >
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > What version of XenServer are you running and how many VMs? Did you
> >> > select the Optimize for XenApp under each VM? What does you disk
> >> > subsystem and network look like?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Joe
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> >> > Behalf Of James Scanlon
> >> > Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 2:54 AM
> >> > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Subject: [THIN] Re: XenServer Slowdown
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Everyone,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > After the applicaiton of all the below listed hotfixes and a number of
> >> > other MS hotfixes related to terminal services
> >> >
> >> > we are still in a position of grief with these servers.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > We are no longer experiencing a slow down or crash over time more what
> >> > we would call a significant slow down for the amount of users vs
> >> > hardware on the servers.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > DL380 G6, 36GB of Physical Ram (34 available to windows)
> >> >
> >> > Dual Intel Xeon 2.8, 16 Cores, x5560
> >> >
> >> > Windows 2008 SP2
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Problem
> >> >
> >> > We are seeing server instability around 50 users, 45 seems to be the
> >> > limit.
> >> >
> >> > With servers of such huge specs does any list legend have any further
> >> > ideas what we could be doing wrong?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Any suggesitons would be very much appreciated!!!!!
> >> >
> >> > Thank s in advance for any assistance or even reading this
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Cheers
> >> >
> >> > James
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > OTHER INFO
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Could it be BIOS settings?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Intel hyperthreading options - enabled
> >> > intel Virtualisation technology - enabled
> >> > no execute memory protection (dep) - on
> >> > Intel vt-d - enabled
> >> > Intel turbo boost technology - enabled
> >> > processor core disable - no
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Performance Stats
> >> >
> >> > #users
> >> >
> >> > logon time(seconds)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 20
> >> >
> >> > 25
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 40
> >> >
> >> > 78
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 48
> >> >
> >> > Error: server busy processing another logon.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 50
> >> >
> >> > 56
> >> >
> >> > 5s to launch word(1st time) - 2s 2nd time
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 60
> >> >
> >> > 75
> >> >
> >> > 7.5s to launch word (1st time) - 4.3 2nd time
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 70
> >> >
> >> > 255
> >> >
> >> > 11s to launch word (1st time) - 5s 2nd time
> >> >
> >> > Lost graphics
> >> >
> >> > RDP logon = 75s.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > All users logged off. 1st user logon = back to 25s
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ________________________________
> >> >
> >> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> >> > Behalf Of James Scanlon
> >> > Sent: 18 November 2010 13:32
> >> > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Subject: [THIN] Re: XenServer Slowdown
> >> >
> >> > Right - further info
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Quite a few of the below are not applied - have an action task to review
> >> > all and install requried and test after each one... thanks again Carl
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > looking into ctx hotfixes but seems we have x64_FR3_Enabled applied to
> >> > all... (is there something similar for windows 2003 32bit server in the
> >> > same farm?)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > thanks again everyone
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > James
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ________________________________
> >> >
> >> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> >> > Behalf Of Carl Stalhood
> >> > Sent: 17 November 2010 19:07
> >> > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Subject: [THIN] Re: XenServer Slowdown
> >> >
> >> > There are a ton of hotfixes for Windows 2008 64-bit post SP2. Here's my
> >> > collection. All of these are related to TS in some way. Some of them
> >> > directly fix performance problems.
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/983533
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2028453
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2028484
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2059743
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2065362
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2213578
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2231728
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2251177
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2261826
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2272153
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2281477
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2300745
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2414013
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2444213
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/949538
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/955365
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/956438
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/958089
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/958596
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/960568
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/967113
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/967933
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/968074
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/968358
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/968930
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/968967
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/968995
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/969290
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/969837
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/969851
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/969940
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/969972
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/970603
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/970689
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/970840
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/970910
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/970911
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/970964
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971253
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971271
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971338
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971347
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971370
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971427
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971438
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971589
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/972495
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/972596
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/972600
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/972904
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/973062
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/973521
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/973554
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/973744
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/974103
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/974195
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/974266
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/974825
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/975848
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976036
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976038
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976110
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976520
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976538
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976674
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977225
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977263
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977269
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977389
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977401
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977541
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977585
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977611
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977675
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977686
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/978042
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/978829
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/978927
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/979241
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/979425
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/979548
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/979557
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/980248
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/980356
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/980380
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/980568
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/980663
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/980945
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981062
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981369
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981462
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981500
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981704
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981891
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981964
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/982051
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/982303
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/982334
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/982416
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/982606
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/982931
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/983237
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/983385
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/983458
> >> >
> >> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/983533
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:27 AM, James Scanlon
> >> > <James.Scanlon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > We are having speed issues with out XenServers
> >> >
> >> > Brand New builds
> >> >
> >> > Deployed with Altiris
> >> >
> >> > Xenserver 5.0
> >> >
> >> > Windows 2008 Standard 64bit
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ______________________________________
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > C. Hoare & Co. is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services
> >> > Authority with registration no. 122093. The FSA's address is 25, The
> >> > North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 5HS.
> >> >
> >> > Registered in England no. 240822. Registered office 37 Fleet St, London,
> >> > EC4P 4DQ
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Confidentiality Disclaimer:
> >> >
> >> > This message and attachments are confidential and may be privileged, and
> >> > are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s). If you are not
> >> > the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this document
> >> > is unauthorised. Information transmitted by email may be intercepted,
> >> > lost, destroyed, corrupted or delayed and as a result, C. Hoare & Co. do
> >> > not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions in the contents of
> >> > this message. If you would like to confirm the contents of this email,
> >> > please request a hard copy version.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > If the contents of this message are of a personal nature, the email will
> >> > have been sent in a personal capacity and not on behalf of C. Hoare &
> >> > Co.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Monitoring/Viruses:
> >> >
> >> > C. Hoare & Co. may monitor all incoming and outgoing emails in line with
> >> > current legislation. Although emails are screened for viruses, C. Hoare
> >> > & Co. cannot guarantee that any transmissions will be virus free.
> >> >
> >> > ________________________________________
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> ************************************************
> >> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> >> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> >> //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> >> Follow ThinList on Twitter
> >> http://twitter.com/thinlist
> >> ************************************************
> >>
Other related posts:
