I've been told it is ok as long as you can ensure that you can control who accesses and who does not. that was from a MS person at iForum who seemed a little unprepared to answer the question. My reseller sold me licenses this way and said they checked with MS first. I have it in writing so that is my recourse if I get in trouble for it since the reseller is a "Platinum Partner". Clear as mud right? Greg On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:13:42 -0500, Bill Beckett <Bill.beckett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Question about access licensing on a terminal server as I've heard different > versions and would like the lists input. If you install MS Access on a > terminal server, I was under the impression that a license was needed for > anyone who connected to that terminal server because they could potentially > run Access. First question...true? > > Second question....could one not restrict availability by either not > publishing the app OR if their users were savvy enough to get to explorer > and run the executable, restrict access to to the executable file itself? > ******************************************************** This Weeks Sponsor SeamlessPlanet.com Domain Names Register your .com domain name for as low as $7.85 One of the lowest prices on the web! Part of The Kenzig Group. http://www.seamlessplanet.com ********************************************************** Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: http://thin.net/links.cfm ThinWiki community - Awesome SBC Search Capabilities! http://www.thinwiki.com *********************************************************** For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm