This forum has for the past few days seen several posts stemming from the TRBC's decision not to "accept" the Tropical Mockingbird. I ask the same question that I have often asked of California Rare Bird Committee members. Who cares? So what? Or, putting it a little more scientifically, who will subsequently use the committee's decision, and to what end? More generically, why do state committees come to these yes/no, go/nogo, accept/reject decisions? Who are their "customers"? I suggest that the one and only impact will be that the ABA checklist committee will not now review the record, and the specie will, therefore, not (yet) become "countable" in the game/hobby of listing. I am not bashing TRBC or any other state committee. They typically do a wonderful job of gathering, and storing data. Their insight and comments are also extremely valuable. It is only the yes/no binary decision that I question. Several CRBC members that I have asked have suggested various "customers" for their decisions. 1. Listers. Most committee members are adamant that they are NOT list policemen. Each birder is always free to count what they like on their lists. 2. Government. Really? Does anyone in Austin care how the mocker got to the US? 3. Future Scientists. I don't think so. After all, today's scientists (including the committee members themselves) are "future scientists" when looking at older records, including those already assessed by older committees. Do they take the previous decision as the final result? Of course not! They re-assess the record, using primary sources - which is exactly what "future scientists" will do to the current decisions - including the mocker. So, I ask again. Who cares? Who really cares? Bruce Barrett San Jose, CA (and occasional visitor to TX - when there is a great new bird to see - such as a Tropical Mockingbird) Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission from the List Owner