It is my understanding that the green-backed Rufous form has never been documented in Texas. If memory serves me it has not been documented outside California where in a small area it may represent 5 percent of a local population. Therefore suggesting green backed adult Selasphorus are not Allen's is suggesting a rare or accidental occurrence instead of a regular occurring species. Would you have us start reporting all immature Purple Martins as Martin species because Grey-breasted HAS been recorded in Texas but in a roost of 100000 I did not conclusively ID all immatures as Purple. Until a green-backed Rufous is found in Texas or other SE states I do not think they should be seriously considered. Immature birds are a completely different matter. Fred Collins Waller Fred Sent from my iPhone On Aug 26, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Graham Floyd <spcgraham.floyd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I want to thank Matt Heindel for his reply. A lot of information packed in > there that I probably wouldn't have gotten had my post not been so terribly > vague. > The bird in question was a male, and it's back was green, with the back of > its tail rufous creeping slightly up into the lower-back. Like in the > Sibley illustration of male Allen's & the green-backed Rufous male. > > Questions I have that may not have answers (yet), are: > > -Do these 5% of green-backed Rufous males occur in a particular geographic > area, or are they equally likely to occur anywhere? I think I saw a video > pointing out they follow the same migration routes year after year, so even > in migration do they occur on certain routes and not others? > > -While several Allen's and numerous Rufous were being banded last winter at > a private-Houston residence (the Williams perhaps?), there was some comment > regarding the molt phase of Allen's and Rufous Hummingbirds allowing > easy visual (vs in-hand) separation at that particular time-of-year. My > question thus becomes: Are there seasons when only Allen's have green-backs? > > Thanks Matt for sharing your knowledge. This is why texbirds as a forum > can never be replaced despite the plethora of other sites. > > Graham Floyd, > San Antonio > > On Monday, August 26, 2013, Matt Heindel wrote: > >> I have read this email a few times and can only assume the choice of >> English was not the best as the question does not make sense. (How would >> anyone be able to tell whether your green-backed bird was one or the other >> based on what is written?) >> >> So, I can imagine other questions that perhaps were meant. 1) Has anyone >> else seen a green-backed Selasphorus at Blucher and if so, what did they >> think it was? Well, again we'll assume you must be referring to an ad male, >> as all Allen's and all female Rufous (and im male) have green backs "just >> like the book." If it was not an ad male, forget about it with this level >> of detail. We were at Blucher and had heard of a detail-less report, so >> gave it a little time, but had no Selasphorus at all. I have not heard of >> other sightings, so for now, question 1 seems to be no. >> >> 2) Perhaps you are asking if you had an ad male Rufous/Allen's with an all >> green back, can you call it an Allen's? Well, you can call it anything you >> want, but �..There are several issues: first, given the "hot, tired" no >> picture thing, it is important to be confident that the back is 100% green. >> Not 90% green, which can look pretty darn green in many views. That is >> another level of detail missing. But, even if the back was 100% green, you >> enter another zone. Some people feel that the % of green-backed ad male >> Rufous is so low that it is safe to call something like this an Allen's. I >> understand that at some level, as data would seem to suggest we are talking >> a very small number (<5%). But, it feels funky to me. I could not imagine >> making up a checklist of stuff I was 95% sure of. What value is in that? >> The fact Allen's is more numerous in TX than was once thought (based on >> banding data) can argue for or against the notion of counting 95%+ >> certainty birds. On the one hand, since we know they are a regular part of >> our avifauna, perhaps making a mistake here or there is not a big deal. I >> take the other route, however, as even when birders think they are not >> making mistakes, some are creeping in. Why lower the bar intentionally? >> And, since Allen's are regular enough, why not wait until one is seen well >> enough to eliminate the doubt? >> >> Matt Heindel >> Fair Oaks Ranch, TX >> >> >> On Aug 25, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Graham Floyd >> <spcgraham.floyd@xxxxxxxxx<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', >> 'spcgraham.floyd@xxxxxxxxx');>> >> wrote: >> >> Hello texbirders, >> Last weekend at Blucher Park in Corpus Christi, I had a green-backed >> Selasphorus hummingbird. It looked just like the Sibley illustration of >> Allen's Hummingbird. I was too hot and miserable to pull out my camera, >> but the hummer was actively circling the TNC house visiting each feeder in >> the heat of the day. Is anyone able to tell whether this green-backed bird >> was a Rufous or Allen's? >> >> Graham Floyd, >> San Antonio, TX >> >> >> Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at >> //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds >> >> Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking >> permission >> from the List Owner >> >> >> >> > > Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at > //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds > > Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission > from the List Owner > > > ____________________________________________________________ 30-second trick for a flat belly This daily 30-second trick BOOSTS your body's #1 fat-burning hormone http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/521b4db17d9584db063e4st02duc Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission from the List Owner