This is a problem which we have faced at a number of sites in Cumbria. My view is that it shouldn't be done, on the basis that whilst a green signal is given to pedestrians, there should be no possibility of a vehicle (motor or cycle) passing through a crossing without having committed an offence eg crossed a stopline at red or cycled on a footway(!). In general terms it isn't fair or safe to effectively tell people it is 'safe to cross' when it isn't. Legally it has to be a clear breach of Regulation 37 paragraph (2)(d) of TSRGD. At one site the proposed all red pedestrian stage was not implemented after consideration of these issues, but dropped kerbs with buff tactile paving and pedestrian refuges were provided. Fortunately the pedestrian crossing demand was not that great at this site. At another site, following much heated debate with the local community, a compulsory left turn TRO was implemented on a pub car park exit which joins the highway within the junction (it wasn't feasible to signalise this exit), and controlled crossings were provided on two legs of the junction only. No crossing facility of any kind is provided on the third leg which left turners from the pub travel into. At a third site, a new all red ped stage was requested (commanded) by Committee at an existing site with private driveways joining the highway within the junction. As potential designers we identified this as a serious problem and a Safety Audit has done the same. The Client is still considering the Safety Audit findings. The view I am often faced with from those who want the crossing is 'well, that isn't likely to happen very often, a pedestrian is more likely to get run down trying to cross the junction with no crossing facilities', and I can see the logic in this argument. But I can't help wondering what would be said if a child was knocked down during the all red ped stage by someone driving out of their drive while all the other traffic was stopped. I would be very interested to know what others' views are on this, particularly with regard to Regulation 37. Regards John Pearson CAPITA Infrastructure Consultancy -----Original Message----- From: Howard Saffer [mailto:Howard.Saffer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 24 September 2002 15:16 To: 'tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: [TCUG] Conflicts between cyclists/accesses and pedestrian facilities We are looking at a couple of schemes (feasibility/design) where it is required to install signalised pedestrian facilities (with audibles/tactiles) - probably on an all -round pedestrian stage. However there are potential conflicts with uncontrolled vehicles (from driveways to houses) and/or cyclists (uncontrolled entry into junction) - and we are pondering over whether to allow this. We think it is likely that cyclists, and drivers from properties, are most likely to emerge and cross the pedestrian facilities when they are green (i.e. when all other traffic is stopped). It this fair and safe for pedestrians? However separately signalling driveways and/or a cycle entry could be confusing for pedestrians - as this would be similar to an all-red stage, but without the ped. crossing signals operating. What do other authorities do in this situation (on the design of new schemes)? Regards Howard Saffer Sheffield City Council The information in this email is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the addressee, please tell us by using the reply facility in your email software as soon as possible. Sheffield City Council cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended please tell us as soon as possible. ----------------------------------------------------------- A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug ----------------------------------------------------------- A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug