Although I still do sugar rocketry work, and have lots of plans for future
sugar propellant research, I have directed most of my recent (past couple
of years) rocketry time into APCP development. Personally, I would love to
discuss this topic if the list moderator would approve this line of
discussion on SugPro.
Richard
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 10:13 AM Boris du Reau <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi Richard
I would love to talk a bit more about AP propellant. Could AP making be
considered or is it a sensitive topic?
Regards
Boris
*De :* sugpro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sugpro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *De
la part de* Richard Nakka
*Envoyé :* 19 August 2023 16:49
*À :* sugpro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Objet :* [sugpro] Re: Is the topic limited to propellant only?
Nothing in particular, its just that this discussion list has been very
quiet the past couple of years and I thought it just *might *be time to
expand the list's mandate. Perhaps sugar propellant discussion has run its
course, I don't know. But as you point out, there is the arocket list...I
don't know how active that list is. I quit that list some twenty years ago.
That said, having two discussion lists on ex rocketry in general may not be
a bad thing.
Alternatively, how might we revive active discussion on sugar rocketry?
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.www.avg.com
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 7:30 AM Steve Peterson <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Richard,
Are there topics you've been wanting to discuss that you felt were
inappropriate for this list?
On 8/17/23 10:23 AM, Richard Nakka wrote:
Steve - This list has been very quiet these past few years, maybe because
we'll all sugar propellant experts by now :-) I wonder if its time to
expand this list's direction to be more general with regard to rocketry.
There's a lot of very knowledgeable people on this list and, being an
e-mail list, is a far better format than a 'forum' (IMHO). And, as Azadul
said, the members are "more knowledgeable and responsive".
Richard
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 11:31 AM Steve Peterson <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Traditionally it has been limited to sugar propellant and motors made
with it, with short forays into related topics tolerated from time to time.
--Steve (moderator)
On 8/17/23 9:24 AM, Azadul Haq wrote:
Just curious, are we allowed to discuss only propellant in this forum
or we can discuss other aspects of experimental high powered rocketry?
I find the members here more responsive and knowledgeable than other
forums.
Thanks.
