You only saw the edited videos. There were earlier ones that were posted on an Arab site,, I don't know the address, I didn't keep it. They weren't on the SITE web site. They were different videos. DR On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > DR, > You crack me up. It's as if you are desperately trying to hang on to the > false reality that has been created for you by the government and the > mainstream media. > > Repeat. For the last time. > > I not only saw the first two videos with my own eyes but I posted a link > to them. > > Had you bothered to watch them you would have seen there was no screaming, > nor was there was there any blood squirting. > > The videos show the executioner (who speaks English with a British > accent), sawing across the throat of the victims at least 6 times yet there > is no blood. Then they switch to a shot with a head sitting on a table that > is covered in blood that doesn't look real. All three videos show the > executioner dressed in black like a ninja and the victims dressed in neatly > pressed orange jump suits. The victims calmly give the a speech and don't > resist having their head pulled back and allowing the executioner to saw > away at it. The same sand dune backdrop that's looks more like a beach and > there is nobody else in the videos, nor any other sound, not even the wind. > That's is what is so funny about them. They are a complete joke. I suspect > that whoever made them intended them to be a joke. > > Dream on. > > -RR > > -----Original Message----- > From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." > Sent: Sep 14, 2014 9:16 PM > To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: SITE Intelligence Group > > RR, > > You cannot have an anonymous Twitter account. > > You probably say a copy of the video, did you hear the dying man > screaming and see the blood squirting? > > That only was in the first video. The first video that was hosted on one > of the Arab jihadist web sites. > > The videos you saw were hosted on SITE. It's not the original video, it > might be either edited or not. > > But it isn't the original. > > Did it have an introduction spoken in Arabic? > > DR > On Sep 14, 2014 11:02 PM, "Ron Ristad" <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> DR, >> I saw the first two videos in their entirety and they were a joke. They >> were on the SITE website. >> >> Quote from SITE website about the latest video which is also posted on >> the website: "Yet, IS' return to Twitter to release the execution video of >> Haines demonstrated a higher level of discreetness than prior releases. The >> video was not posted under the name of any of IS’ official media groups, >> but rather by an account under an *anonymous* name." >> >> Even if any of the videos are on some Arab website now, if anybody could >> and did download the video off the SITE website and upload to YouTube then >> any other website could do the same. It doesn't mean that ISIS posted it. I >> could find no evidence that ISIS posted any of the videos anywhere. It >> would make no sense whatsoever for ISIS to make videos and put their name >> on them and then post them anonymously. >> >> Even if they did behead somebody, that's just the way they perform >> executions in that part of the world. Ever see anybody get the electric >> chair? That is far more horrific. (Or maybe I just feel that way having >> been shocked so many times working with electrical equipment). How about >> the French guillotine? I think they still might do it. Isn't that >> beheading? They broadcast beheadings on TV in Saudi Arabia. We used to make >> jokes about that. This Saturday! See Abdul's head chopped off. Be there or >> be square! I don't see what the big deal is. >> >> -RR >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." >> Sent: Sep 14, 2014 8:18 PM >> To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: SITE Intelligence Group >> >> The videos were posted on a site with Arabic name, I do not know Arabic >> but it was similar to ISIS in Arabic. >> >> The reason they cannot be hosted for long is one thing: bandwidth. The >> demands on the server even if robust would be huge. >> >> The first of the previous videos did show the beheading. But YouTube >> quickly censored it. You either removed the beheading or it will be >> removed from circulation. >> >> Youtube has an application that recognized pattern in a video file and >> can recognize it to be a copyright work, or a video that has been reported >> copyright. >> >> Right now ISIS ISIL is using Russian site like facebook. >> >> You will notice that SITE says the video was posted to Twitter. You are >> aware that Twitter does not supply users with any storage space, so >> thevideo was hosted elsewhere. >> >> The Twitter account may be under an assumed name, but it cannot be an >> anonymous name. >> >> It is not so bad they do not tell you where they got their intelligence. >> >> I am sure you could purchase the name for a high dollar amount. >> >> But if you want to do better than they do, find the Jihadist Twitter >> accounts and monitor them for new postings like SITE does. >> >> If I said before that the Arabic web site had yaken down the videos, they >> had not. What happened was that the servers were overloaded. The file was >> still there. I tried every method I know to get the file. The file was >> there but it would only download a 2 bps even with resumes to try to get a >> better priority. >> >> DR >> On Sep 14, 2014 8:17 PM, "Ron Ristad" <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> DR, >>> This latest video was first posted on Twitter. "The video was not >>> posted under the name of any of IS’ official media groups, but rather by an >>> account under an *anonymous name*. " >>> >>> You can watch it on the SITE website: >>> >>> >>> http://news.siteintelgroup.com/blog/index.php/entry/282-is-beheads-briton-david-haines,-threatens-to-execute-another-briton,-alan-henning >>> >>> Note that the previous videos were such bad fakes that they don't even >>> show the beheading this time. What, did you think it did? >>> >>> The previous videos SITE posted they claimed they got off "a jihaddist >>> website". but they don't say which one. >>> >>> I ask you. If they got them off a jihaddist website then what reason >>> would this unknown jihaddist website have to take them down? >>> >>> Also, If the latest video was posted on Twitter by ISIS then why would >>> they use an anonymous account? That makes no sense. >>> >>> It only makes sense because when these things are reported on the TV >>> they NEVER mention where the videos came from. People believe it because >>> they are brain dead and believe anything they're told. >>> >>> The YouTube videos are just copies that people make and post them. >>> >>> The reason why SITE took them down is because they had become a >>> laughingstock. >>> >>> -RR >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." >>> Sent: Sep 14, 2014 4:09 PM >>> To: "sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" >>> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: SITE Intelligence Group >>> >>> No, what I am saying is that they are originally posted to Arabic web >>> sites, then they are posted to YouTube but YT has almost automatied the >>> scanning that takes these videos down. The first time there was a >>> beheading I was able to see the whole video including the beheading, the >>> second time I missed it, most of the links that I was able to find got a >>> "YouTube has removed this video". >>> >>> Here is one of the words that you can search for to get a video الدولة >>> الإسلامية >>> >>> *If I were serious about it, I would track various web sites that >>> included الدولة الإسلامية in the name. I'd compare the index.html and >>> hyperlinks from that page with a script, if there were new content I would >>> use wget or other program to download it before it was removed by content >>> censors. * >>> >>> *netstiff and urlwatch can do the job.* >>> >>> *DR* >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> DR, >>>> So you are saying that they only post these videos on Arabic language >>>> websites even though they're all in English? That makes a lot of sense. You >>>> crack me up. Either ISIS or you has to be really dumb. >>>> >>>> -RR >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." >>>> Sent: Sep 14, 2014 1:45 PM >>>> To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: SITE Intelligence Group >>>> >>>> I bet I could find lots if I spoke Arabian. I found ISIL by finding >>>> the Arabic characters for it, but I forgot to bookmark it. >>>> >>>> ISIS has much to gain by doing this. They use terror. >>>> >>>> DR >>>> On Sep 14, 2014 2:45 PM, "Ron Ristad" <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> DR, >>>>> The woman is not just Jewish but a self proclaimed Zionist who lives >>>>> in Israel and hates Iraqis. In itself that means nothing. But does it make >>>>> any sense that this group would "find it" - find it where? - and ISIS not >>>>> send it to the media? >>>>> >>>>> Not to mention that the video is so obviously faked that it's almost >>>>> funny. It would be hilarious if it wasn't being used as a justification to >>>>> bomb people and go to war. It wouldn't surprise me if ISIS did terrible >>>>> things but I can't believe they did this. It makes as much sense as Assad >>>>> inviting UN inspectors into Syria and then gassing civilians in their >>>>> presence. ISIS has nothing to gain by doing such a thing and everything to >>>>> lose. They are not that stupid. >>>>> >>>>> -RR >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." >>>>> Sent: Sep 14, 2014 11:48 AM >>>>> To: "sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" >>>>> Subject: [sparkscoffee] SITE Intelligence Group >>>>> >>>>> SITE Intelligence Group >>>>> https://www.siteintelgroup.com/ >>>>> >>>>> SITE is a USA based private intelligence group. >>>>> >>>>> It doesn't surprise me that they found the beheading video before >>>>> anyone else, it is their job, they specialize in terrorist intel. >>>>> >>>>> Started by a woman who is Jewish, so I guess that's zionist. >>>>> >>>>> So what? I am an Americanist. >>>>> >>>>> DR >>>>> >>>>> >>>