[sparkscoffee] Re: Obama & Holder Destroy the Constitution

  • From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 12:26:52 GMT

Lee, Since you asked... I was playing in college in the sixties (American 
University in DC) and also with the British embassy when the first pro team 
(Washington Darts) was formed. I met the coach (Charlie "Cannonball Fleming" at 
a party at the embassy and we became friends. Charlie had played for Sunderland 
when they were the English powerhouse and got his nickname, "Cannonball" 
because he was said to have the hardest shot in English soccer at the time.  
The owner of the team (another Scotsman - Norman Sutherland), being the cheap 
skate he was, hired 7 of the Jamaican national team. They weren't bad players 
but not at the level of our competition. Norman then brought over a couple of 
Scottish internationals, Billy Fraser who had played in England for 
Huddersfield and then Hearts in Edinburgh, and Johnny Kerr who went on to have 
a great career in America.  He  played for the legendary Cosmos in New York 
along with Pele and Beckenbauer and eventually became the players rep for the 
league.  He was a great guy and a great player. His son John Jr who I helped 
coach as a kid, went on to be the first American born player to play in the 
English First Division.  Billy was only 21 at the time and a terrific player. 
We ended up rooming together and he taught me a lot. Norman thought it would be 
good to have :"token"  American on the team so I ended up training with them 
under an amateur contract. (keep in mind that in the '60s, except for St. Louis 
and Baltimore, Americans playing soccer were minimal.  In fact, when we would 
give clinics, maybe only 5 kids (dragged by their mothers) would even show up. 
We've come a long way in this country for sure! We played Santos in an 
exhibition game at RFK stadium when Pele was still playing for them. What a 
night!  We were up 3 - 0 at halftime an the Jamaicans were going crazy. Billy 
just laughed and told me, wait for the second half. (he had played against 
Santos in Europe.)  Sure enough, we lost 7-3.  Pele and the boys were just 
being polite to their hosts in the first half. (which I found out later was 
their normal procedure when playing exhibitions against inferior teams.)  It 
was like a switch was thrown and we (mostly the Jamaicans) were like not even 
in the game. I then went out to LA and played with Thistle FC, another Scottish 
team based in Santa Monica. That too was a learning experience. When I started 
going to sea on a regular basis, I would look for a pick up game in whatever 
country I was in. Two stick in my memory.  Beach soccer  in Santos went on 24/7 
under the lights, complete with Samba music and barbeque's.   In Buenos Aires, 
at the Areoparke by the river, it was like a Serengeti Plains of football on 
the weekends - dozens of games going on.  One neat thing about the Argentines 
(back then at least) was that during the off season, the pros would join in 
these games. (nothing you would see from an American professional team!)  I 
actually played in a pickup game with Maradona present ! I continued to play, 
moving down the geezer food chain into the Sunday amateur leagues until I was 
60 years old. I 'd still be playing except for making a cosmic mistake. When at 
a soccer reunion of guys I had played with and against for 30 years, I made the 
mistake of saying I had never had a knee injury (all the others were showing 
their scars.) I forgot the universe is always listening. The very next weekend 
game, I went up for a header and my cleats caught in the rutted ground. Felt 
the knee go and knew (before I hit the ground) that my career was over. I had a 
good long run so can't complain. Though I DO miss the game. I play a lot of 
golf now. Another challenge ! (and new obsession.)  JS
---------- Original Message ----------
From: "Lee, NI7I" <pixiehat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Obama & Holder Destroy the Constitution
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 16:11:50 -0700


Were you a professional&#65533; footballer?&#65533; We (or at least I tend to) 
tend to forget that most of us had other lives outside going to sea for a 
living.&#65533; Would
love to hear some of your (cleaned up versions) stories of professional sports.

Lee
NI7I


On 10/5/2014 10:54 AM, schalestock@xxxxxxxx wrote:RR&#65533;You put your finger 
on something that I have always found amazing and utterly illogical. Treat them 
like they treat others and they cry like babies.&#65533;I used to see this on 
the soccer field. 30 something yuppies, thinking they were being "clever" would 
intentional trip or kick other players.&#65533; Having played professionally 
against hard men who never did anything they didn't mean to,&#65533;it first 
made me laugh and then angry. When I retaliated, the referee never saw it. But 
these pathetic babies would squeal like little girls. How DARE anyone do what 
they were doing to others. This, as you say, is their mentality - and why 
nothing short of a punch in the nose will ever get through to 
them.&#65533;&#65533;JS

---------- Original Message ----------
From: Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Obama & Holder Destroy the Constitution
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 11:26:05 -0600 (GMT-06:00)

JS,
You don't seem to understand Stanley's culture. With these people your are 
either with them or against them. They are no different than ISIS except they 
are a little more tactful and they cry like babies when they are treated the 
same way they treat others.

-RR
-----Original Message----- 
From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" <schalestock@xxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Oct 5, 2014 10:37 AM 
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Obama & Holder Destroy the Constitution 

Stanley,&#65533;I can only marvel at the labyrinth of your mind. What is hell 
does FDR have to do with Churchill's comments on democracy?&#65533; Inquiring 
minds would like to know.&#65533; Can you please try an stay focused on the 
point under discussion.&#65533;JS

---------- Original Message ----------
From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "sblumen123@xxxxxxx" 
for DMARC)
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Obama & Holder Destroy the Constitution
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 11:59:00 -0400

&#65533;
JSThis post of yours exposes how short sighted, shallow thinking&#65533;a 
memory you have. Winston Churchill owes FDR for saveing England from most 
likely a successful invasion by Hitler when they signed a Lend-lease agreement 
and 50 older Destroyers and a lot of other war material was given&#65533;almost 
immediately. It was you who pissed all over FDR for getting us into&#65533;WW2 
which Hitler might have won if we didn't get into&#65533;which was one good 
war&#65533;that must be&#65533;won. In my humble opinion WC would 
think&#65533;quite lowly of your condemnation of long sighted FDR although most 
everyone has some faults including them, me and you.&#65533;Comrade B, the 
realist mensch&#65533;&#65533;&#65533;&#65533;&#65533;-----Original Message-----
From: schalestock <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sat, Oct 4, 2014 12:33 pm
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Obama & Holder Destroy the Constitution

RR&#65533;Well, as Churchill said, "Democracy is the worst form of government 
except for all the others."&#65533; I think what he was really getting at is 
that democracy, illusory or otherwise, is a vicarious substitue for violence 
and anarchy.&#65533; Which fits nicely with Jefferson's observation that 
American democracy can only work if the elected have some modicum of 
integrey.&#65533; We see the proof of that with Obama - albeit the negative 
side of the coin.&#65533;JS

---------- Original Message ----------
From: Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Obama & Holder Destroy the Constitution
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 10:00:36 -0600 (GMT-06:00)

&#65533;JS,
It seems to me that anybody who votes for one party or another, Democrat or 
Republican, is a socialist since voting for any party is collectivism.&#65533; 
I see no fundamental differences between the two parties.&#65533; They only 
pretend to have differences.

I agree that things are going to get a lot worse.&#65533; I see no other 
possible outcome, at least for the vast majority of Americans. The new 
definition of success will be just to survive.

-RR
-----Original Message----- 
From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" <schalestock@xxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Oct 4, 2014 5:04 AM 
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Obama & Holder Destroy the Constitution 

RR&#65533;A thoughtful and interesting post. Personally, I think the rising 
tide of lawlessness in this country can, in part, be laid at the feet of the 
Obama/Holder dictatorship. People sense that the law is meaningless anymore - 
Or as Obama is positing, the law is what I say it is.&#65533;One only has to 
read Obama's book, Dreams of my Father, to gain an insight into his 
mindset.&#65533; His absent, psychopathic racist&#65533;father told him that he 
believed in 100% taxation with the "government" dispensing favors to the 
compliant. This is the classic African tribal chief mentality - all power, all 
privilege, no responsibility.&#65533; When you couple this with Obama's 
neurotic ditsy mother and his hard core Socialist grandparents, its little 
wonder he thinks and acts as he does.&#65533;But the supreme irony is that 
enough of the American people bought into his bullshit about "fundamentally 
changing America".&#65533;&#65533; Just the statement alone should have been 
enough to raise the red flag. But the voting demographics that elected him tell 
the whole tale. 90% African Americans (not surprising), the stupid white 
(educated) females and their wimp eunuch cohorts, and of course, the cynical 
democrat politicians that don't give a rat's ass about the country as long as 
they stay in power.&#65533;I'm afraid things are going to have to get a lot 
worse before they get better - if in fact they ever do before we are 
irrevocably and "fundamentally changed".&#65533;JS

---------- Original Message ----------
From: Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Obama & Holder Destroy the Constitution
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:34:35 -0600 (GMT-06:00)

&#65533;Posted on October 3, 2014 by Martin Armstrong

I have studied Constitutional Law intensely and I can say with conviction that 
history will indeed remember Eric Holder and his mentor Obama for much more 
than merely the top 9 controversial issues everyone writes about. Mr. 
Holder&#65533;s more than five years as the nation&#65533;s chief legal officer 
has been absolutely devastating to the future of the nation and the Rule of 
Law. This goes far beyond merely the NSA, IRS scandal and the State Department 
scandals.

Barack Obama &#65533;s White House has done serious long-term damage to the 
world economy and the civil rights of every American. Obama and Holder pushed 
the authority of the executive branch of the federal government far beyond any 
democratic process. The administrative agencies under the Executive branch have 
gone well beyond the edge of the Constitution and law in a systemic manner that 
is truly breath-taking. Unlike previous presidencies where there was just one 
controversial instance, the Obama-Holder team have embarked on virtually a 
dictatorship under the pretense of democracy. I do not say this lightly nor as 
a political partisan.

Everyone who has ever studied law had basic rules that government simply could 
not go beyond &#65533; they just can&#65533;t do that! Everyone in the legal 
community if they spoke freely has now learned that what they took for granted 
as clear meaning of existing law just no longer applies. Once you undermine the 
Rule of Law, everything else collapses for in the end game, you cannot even 
prove you own anything when it is subject to interpretation and discretion.

In 2011, the Obama-Holder tag-team just did what they wanted anyway ignoring 
the Judiciary regarding off-shore oil drilling. Believe it or not, Federal 
Judge Martin Feldman found the government in contempt holding: &#65533;Each 
step the government took following the court&#65533;s imposition of a 
preliminary injunction showcases its defiance.&#65533; Of course nobody goes to 
jail for how can you order the Justice Department to put itself in jail for 
contempt? This is why we need an independently elected Roman Tribune who can 
prosecute anyone in government and is outside the Executive Branch. We call 
that a Special Prosecutor to investigate a president &#65533; well we need a 
real elected office of Tribune to secure the Constitution and be able to 
criminal charge Obama, Holder, or John Boehner .

The Obama-Holder&#65533; tag-team has effectively made federal legal authority 
boundless eliminating any restraint upon government as Obama justified the 
actions of the NSA saying you have to give up liberty to be safe. &#65533;I 
think the American people understand that there are some trade-offs 
involved,&#65533; Obama said when questioned by reporters at a health care 
event in San Jose, Calif. He also famously said: &#65533;It&#65533;s important 
to recognize that you can&#65533;t have 100 percent security and also then have 
100 percent privacy and zero inconvenience,&#65533; he said. 
&#65533;We&#65533;re going to have to make some choices as a society. And what 
I can say is that in evaluating these programs, they make a difference in our 
capacity to anticipate and prevent possible terrorist activity.&#65533;

The question is &#65533; safe from whom? Obama stands in history directly in 
opposition to those who founded this nation. In Belgium Obama clearly stated 
the struggle between the state and the people. His address in Belgium to the 
European Youth who are suffering unemployment levels almost three times that of 
the Great Depression on March 26, 2014 obviously demonstrates he knows what he 
is doing to tear down democracy.

&#65533; &#65533;The belief that through conscience and free will, each of us 
has the right to live as we choose.&#65533; The belief that power is derived 
from the consent of the governed, and that laws and institutions should be 
established to protect that understanding.&#65533; And those ideas eventually 
inspired a band of colonialists across an ocean, and they wrote them into the 
founding documents that still guide America today, including the simple truth 
that all men &#65533; and women &#65533; are created equal.

&#65533;But those ideals have also been tested &#65533; here in Europe and 
around the world.&#65533; Those ideals have often been threatened by an older, 
more traditional view of power.&#65533; This alternative vision argues that 
ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that 
order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an 
all-powerful sovereign. &#65533;

&#65533;And just as we meet our responsibilities as individuals, we must be 
prepared to meet them as nations.&#65533; Because we live in a world in which 
our ideals are going to be challenged again and again by forces that would drag 
us back into conflict or corruption.&#65533; We can&#65533;t count on others to 
rise to meet those tests.&#65533; The policies of your government, the 
principles of your European Union, will make a critical difference in whether 
or not the international order that so many generations before you have strived 
to create continues to move forward, or whether it retreats.&#65533;

Obama has stated clearly that he has come full circle. He believes that right 
must be surrendered to the sovereign government for only it can defend freedom 
by taking it from the people. This is very strange logic.

The Obama-Holder theory of law has been mind-blowing. Essentially, they stand 
for the proposition that the needs of justice supersede the law&#65533;s 
boundaries. Obama has effectively stated he will take your rights and money but 
for a good purpose &#65533; government power to protect your right to have 
rights and money? This is precisely what Thrasymachus warned about and every 
law professor when confronted with this question would have responded &#65533; 
that is not law. Nevertheless, Obama has stood for the proposition that justice 
is merely the self-interest of the stronger &#65533; government.

Anyone who thinks I am exaggerating this in any possible way should look at 
what Obama said himself. In July 2011 over the debt ceiling, Obama said 
publicly that he would like to &#65533;bypass Congress and change the laws on 
my own.&#65533; He said this again in June 2014 with respect to immigration 
reform. This is what one expects from a dictator &#65533; not an elected 
official who pretends to be a Constitutional lawyer. The very next year, Obama 
then made his unconstitutional recess appointments to the National Labor 
Relations Board. Effectively, he bypassed Congress to stuff his own people in 
positions without the approval of the people. UNHEARD OF! Yet Obama also said 
back in 2011: &#65533;Sometimes when I talk to immigration advocates, they wish 
I could just bypass Congress and change the law myself, but that&#65533;s not 
how a democracy works.&#65533;

The antics of the Obama-Holder tag-team have displayed the audacity to argue in 
federal courts what difference does it make? The real curious phase is not only 
used by Obama-Holder in court, when Hilary testified before Congress regarding 
the attack if it was a protest of just some guys out for a walk and decided to 
kill some Americans she too simply replied &#65533; what difference does it 
make? This is not a legal argument in any court under any system of law that I 
am aware of. It makes a huge difference for even as Hillary tried to dismiss 
the attack, one is an organized terrorist attack and the other is just a random 
act of violence.

I am not the only one with a problem here regarding the abuse of power of 
Obama-Holder. In 2013, D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Brett Kavanaugh 
wrote that the Obama administration&#65533;s legal claims raised 
&#65533;significant questions about the scope of the Executive&#65533;s 
authority to disregard federal statutes.&#65533;

Obama&#65533;s praise of Holder one would think he offhandedly saved the 
nation. Certainly not from the abuse of government. The legal precedents are 
shocking and very alarming. These people never get it. Obama expands the reach 
of the Presidency and the next one comes in and always expands it further. 
Nobody ever reforms. So unfortunately, we are headed down the creek in a boat 
that is leaking without a paddle. Our children will never know the world in 
which we grew up when once upon a time there use to be a friendly face behind 
every badge.

-RR




____________________________________________________________
The #1 Worst Carb Ever?
Click to Learn #1 Carb that Kills Your Blood Sugar (Don't Eat This!)
FixYourBloodSugar.com 
____________________________________________________________
Map Your Flood Risk
Find Floodplan Maps, Facts, FAQs, Your Flood Risk Profile and More!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/5433dc20b90e35c2074cest04vuc

Other related posts: