[sparkscoffee] Re: New York City Asks: What Happened to the 1,116 Miss ...

  • From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:23:55 -0400

RR
Thanks for the compliment and the series of posts, it is all very  
educational and interesting.
 
Comrade B., The house Jewish, Zionist, Socialist
 
 
 
In a message dated 9/12/2014 9:27:11 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

Maybe it  can burn that hot in free air when combined with compressed 
oxygen like an oxy  acetylene torch or a turbo jet engine, but that has  
nothing 
to do with burning inside a building. As Stan would say, think, think,  
think.


-----Original  Message----- 
From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx"  
Sent: Sep 12, 2014 7:10 AM 
To:  sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: New York City  Asks: What Happened to the 1,116 
Miss ing 9/11 Victims? 

<ZZZHT
Steel melts at 2500 degrees. Burning jet fuel can reach 1790F. That  
degrades  steel by as much as 65% - failure level.  Creamation  fires reach 
1800 
to 2000 deg F. You can pull that out of your ass if it  makes you feel better.
 
JS


---------- Original Message ----------
From: Ron Ristad  <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:  [sparkscoffee] Re: New York City Asks: What Happened to the 1,116 
Miss ing  9/11 Victims?
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 06:41:18 -0600 (GMT-06:00)

JS,
How  did you come up with that temperature for burning jet fuel? Did you 
pull it  out of your ass?

Excerpt from the scientific report:

So, the  jet fuel could (at the very most) have only added T - 25 = 282 - 
25 = 257° C  (495° F) to the temperature of the typical office fire that 
developed.  

Remember, this figure is a huge  over-estimate, as (among other things) it 
assumes that the steel and  concrete had an unlimited amount of time to 
absorb the heat, whereas in  reality, the jet fuel fire was all over in one or 
two minutes, and the  energy not absorbed by the concrete and steel within 
this brief period (that  is, almost all of it) would have been vented to the 
outside world.  

Quote from the FEMA report into the collapse of WTC's One and Two  (Chapter 
Two). 

Here are statements from three eye-witnesses that  provide evidence that 
the heating due to the jet fuel was indeed minimal.  

Donovan Cowan was in an open elevator at the 78th floor sky-lobby  (one of 
the impact floors of the South Tower) when the aircraft hit. He has  been 
quoted as saying: "We went into the elevator. As soon as I hit the  button, 
that's when there was a big boom. We both got knocked down. I  remember 
feeling this intense heat. The doors were still open. The heat  lasted for 
maybe 
15 to 20 seconds I guess. Then it stopped."  

Stanley Praimnath was on the 81st floor of the South Tower: "The  plane 
impacts. I try to get up and then I realize that I'm covered up to my  shoulder 
in debris. And when I'm digging through under all this rubble, I  can see 
the bottom wing starting to burn, and that wing is wedged 20 feet in  my 
office doorway." 

Ling Young was in her 78th floor office:  "Only in my area were people 
alive, and the people alive were from my  office. I figured that out later 
because I sat around in there for 10 or 15  minutes. That's how I got so 
burned." 

Neither Stanley Praimnath  nor Donovan Cowan nor Ling Young were cooked by 
the jet fuel fire. All three  survived. 

You can read the complete scientific analysis  here:

http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htm

-RR


-----Original  Message----- 
From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>  
Sent: Sep 12, 2014 4:44 AM 
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: New York City Asks: What Happened to the  1,116 
Miss ing 9/11 Victims? 

RR
 
One explantion COULD be they were molated in the burning jet fuel  which 
burns at 2500 deg. F - I think about the same as a  creamatorium.  Just a 
thought.
 
JS


---------- Original Message ----------
From: Ron Ristad  <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:  [sparkscoffee] New York City Asks: What Happened to the 1,116 
Missing 9/11  Victims?
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:40:25 -0600 (GMT-06:00)

More  than 11 years after the catastrophic destruction of the World Trade  
Center, New York City’s government is finally asking: What in the world  
could have happened to the missing 1,116 victims?

In every building  collapse in history, all of the victims’ bodies have 
been recovered more  or less intact. That is because falling buildings crush 
human bodies. They  do not shred them into tiny pieces, or cause them to 
vanish into thin  air.

Yet on September 11th, 2001, the most famous “building  collapses” in 
history somehow caused the bodies of more than 1,000 victims  to magically 
disappear. Not even a shred of skin, a fragment of  fingernail, or a shard of 
bone from any of these bodies was ever  recovered, despite meticulous “sifting 
and bucketing” efforts.

But  that’s not the only mystery. Hardly anything was left of the 1,634 WTC 
 occupants who did not completely vanish. Most of the human remains  
discovered and DNA-identified were in the form of tiny, shredded pieces,  not 
intact bodies.

What happened to the nearly 3,000 human bodies  that were annihilated 
during the ten-second disappearances of the  110-story Towers? Answer: The same 
thing that happened to the office  furniture, filing cabinets, telephones, 
computers, and other contents of  the Towers. Virtually no remains of these 
objects were ever recovered,  either. They – like the human bodies – were 
somehow transformed into a  mixture of tiny shards and sub-100-micron dust, 
which floated out to sea  and slowly settled into the Atlantic. As one of the 
sifters-and-bucketers  remarked, the biggest piece of office furniture 
recovered from Ground Zero  was a tiny fragment of a telephone keypad.

Now, more than 11 years  later, the New York City government is finally 
acknowledging the mystery.  In a memo to the 9/11 victims’ families, NYC 
official Casey Holloway  announced that this Monday, April 1st, the city’s 
Chief 
Medical Examiner  will begin sifting through 60 truckloads of World Trade 
Center  construction debris at Fresh Kills Landfill on Staten Island. The city  
says it hopes to find remains of at least some of the 1,116 missing  
victims.

Unfortunately, the chances of finding remains of more than  a few 
additional victims seem remote. After all, the Twin Towers debris –  which 
amounted 
to less than 50% of the mass of the Towers (what happened  to the rest of the 
mass?) – was already meticulously sifted and bucketed  more than a decade 
ago. The city’s decision to sift through recent  construction debris 
beginning April 1st bears more than a passing  resemblance to George W. Bush’s 
decision to get down on his hands and  knees to look under his desk for the 
missing Iraqi WMD. Is this some kind  of cruel April Fools’ Day joke?

The absence of crushed-but-intact  human bodies, office furniture and 
equipment, and 50% of the Towers’ mass  suggests that the Twin Towers did not 
collapse – they exploded. (See the  Youtube film “North Tower Exploding.”) 
This would explain why tiny human  bone fragments were discovered scattered all 
over the roof of the  neighboring Deutsche Bank building in 2006. No simple 
gravitational  collapse, like the one posited by US government’s official 
NIST Report,  could possibly blast human skeletons to smithereens and deposit 
those  smithereens all over the roof of a neighboring building.

Were the  Twin Towers, and the thousands of people inside them, blown to 
bits by  explosives? That is what many of the 9/11 victims’ family members 
believe.  Robert McIlvaine, whose son Bobby was murdered in the Twin Towers on 
9/11,  has stated that roughly half the family members share his suspicion 
that  the Towers were explosively demolished in a false-flag attack. William  
Rodriguez, the famous 9/11 hero who has spoken to hundreds of thousands of  
people around the world, is another representative of the 9/11 survivors  
who asserts that the evidence for “controlled demolition” is an open  secret.

Read the full article at: _veteranstoday.com_ 
(http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/04/01/911victims/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=911victims
) 

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/04/01/911victims/?utm_source=rss&utm_mediu
m=rss&utm_campaign=911victims

-RR



____________________________________________________________
_The End of the  "Made-In-China" Era
The impossible (but real)  technology that could make you impossibly rich.
_ (http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5412cee56968e4ee5440cst01vuc) 
_fool.com_ 
(http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5412cee56968e4ee5440cst01vuc) 





Other related posts:

  • » [sparkscoffee] Re: New York City Asks: What Happened to the 1,116 Miss ...