[sparkscoffee] Re: Burger Abandons America
- From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." <n1ea@xxxxxxxx>
- To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 16:16:31 -0400
A little bit, my father was an accountant, I took some accounting and
management courses, I worked as manager for a sound design and rental
operation, which was a local shop for International Alliance of Theatrical
Stage Employees. I worked very hard at cutting costs so we could pay union
wages to the workers. It was no problem when dealing with the downtown
houses, Schuburt, Wilbur, Music Hall, etc, but where it became difficult
was competing against non-union companies. I also ignored many of the
union rules because doing installations a worker had to do carpentry,
electrician, sound work. No way was I going to send to the Union Hall to
get a gaffer to drill a hole in a speaker box so we could change the
connecting jack for the speaker cable.
So I learned purchasing, accounts receivable, accounts payable, etc.
I finally left because there was no money left to pay me. A big show stole
about $100,000 of equipment, couldn't sue them because they went broke.
Police never turned up anything.
The union men got paid but not the office.
I guess in communusm, the workers would give me back my losses?
73
DR
On Sep 2, 2014 2:18 PM, "Redacted sender Sblumen123@xxxxxxx for DMARC" <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> DR
> You are smarter then me when it comes to high finance.
>
> Comrade B, the protectionist socialist
>
> In a message dated 9/2/2014 1:47:13 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> n1ea@xxxxxxxx writes:
>
> Comrade,
>
> You simply do not understand corporations. All money taken out is taxed
> as income tax to the benificiary or employee, except if it capital spent in
> the delivery and making of goods and services.
>
> It is necessary to make a profit or break even, otherwise it would go
> broke because it could no longer pay its bills.
>
> If a corporation makes more money it can pay its workers more money, more
> benefits, invest in research and development, buy new ships, hire a retired
> R/O, give him $75,000 for his services in radioand running the 70mm wide
> screen arc motion picture projector, support IATSE and ARA.
>
> A very good thing.
>
> You should have trained as a financial officer for a corporation.
>
> 73
>
> DR
> On Sep 2, 2014 1:20 PM, "Redacted sender Sblumen123@xxxxxxx for DMARC" <
> dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> DR
>> Sorry, we are talking apples and oranges wasting each others time.
>>
>> Comrade B
>>
>> In a message dated 9/1/2014 2:41:10 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>> n1ea@xxxxxxxx writes:
>>
>> I did. Your foundation is completely wrong: There is NO "He".
>>
>> "We" own corporations.
>>
>> What you have said is completly wrong, all of it because your fundemental
>> assumption is incorrect.
>>
>> It's like my talking about uncircumcized Jews who eat pork, beef and milk
>> together for breakfast: It shows that I know nothing about Jews, or the
>> Brooklyn based Golliath Condom Company on Delancy Street that sells kosher
>> pickles.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> DR
>> On Sep 1, 2014 2:06 PM, "Redacted sender Sblumen123@xxxxxxx for DMARC" <
>> dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> DR
>>> Re-read what I wrote and reply to it.
>>>
>>> Comrade B
>>>
>>> In a message dated 9/1/2014 1:37:22 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>>> n1ea@xxxxxxxx writes:
>>>
>>> Yes, but the "he" that you speak of does not exist, it is "we" the
>>> stockholders. If management behaves poorly, we can abandon our investment,
>>> sell our shares and reinvest in a corporation that we believe is better.
>>>
>>> Or we can bring up behavior of Board or Officers upan Annual Meeting or
>>> fire them.
>>>
>>> Please Learn before you Think.
>>>
>>> 73
>>>
>>> DR
>>> On Sep 1, 2014 12:51 PM, "Redacted sender Sblumen123@xxxxxxx for DMARC"
>>> <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> DR
>>>> The consumer not only pays all the cost of productions including
>>>> corporate taxes but for profits
>>>> like dividens for you and others and for new factories and research and
>>>> development and mega yachts
>>>> and executive Jets which all may be made in communist China
>>>> depending on the will of the captalist
>>>> whose motto is, profitism before patriotism. With left over profits he
>>>> can make a free speech contribution
>>>> to the legislators of his choice. Got the picture, think, think, think.
>>>>
>>>> Comrade B, Protectionist Socialist
>>>>
>>>> In a message dated 8/31/2014 9:20:11 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>>>> djringjr@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>>>>
>>>> Corporations are owned by people like me and you. If I get a bigger
>>>> dividend for the money I have invested, I can buy something I need or want.
>>>>
>>>> If a corporation buys a mega jet, they need crew for it, good jobsfor
>>>> talented men and women
>>>>
>>>> If it were the old days they'd need a flight radio officer, maybe it
>>>> would be an ARA job!
>>>>
>>>> With more money corporations can build new factories, invest in
>>>> reseatch and development, buy a ship with R/O job.
>>>>
>>>> High tax rate promotes getting rid of net income by increasing
>>>> managerial pay so there will be no retained (taxable) earnings. When they
>>>> do that the rich get richer and of course have to pay personal income
>>>> taxes, but it is better for corporation to retain eanings tax free.
>>>>
>>>> Everyone misses the point that Burger King will still pay 100% USA tax
>>>> to IRS for profit from each and every Burger King and USA Tim Horton's, so
>>>> all USA will lose is corporate tax.
>>>>
>>>> Do not attack things you do not understand, when people see you know
>>>> nothing true, they will not vote for you.
>>>>
>>>> That's why many do not vote socialist, communist.
>>>>
>>>> 73
>>>>
>>>> DR
>>>> On Aug 31, 2014 3:30 PM, "Redacted sender Sblumen123@xxxxxxx for
>>>> DMARC" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> DR
>>>>> Are you nuts proposing the fat cats tax to be free so they can buy
>>>>> bigger mega yachts, executive Jets
>>>>> and have a little left over to make contributions to politicians of
>>>>> their choice under the new free
>>>>> speech gift? Even the Republicans don't say that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Comrade B
>>>>>
>>>>> In a message dated 8/29/2014 6:18:33 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>>>>> n1ea@xxxxxxxx writes:
>>>>>
>>>>> Another reason to reduce corporate tax to ZERO.
>>>>>
>>>>> You do that and there will be such an influx of prosperity and income
>>>>> taxes in USA, your head will spin.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dumb Democrats just do not get economics.
>>>>>
>>>>> DR
>>>>> On Aug 29, 2014 8:55 AM, "Ron Ristad" <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> As Burger King heads north for Canada's lower corporate tax rate,
>>>>>> we speak to Rolling Stone contributing editor Tim Dickinson about his new
>>>>>> article, "The Biggest Tax Scam Ever." Dickinson reports on how top U.S.
>>>>>> companies are avoiding hundreds of billions of dollars by parking their
>>>>>> profits abroad — and still receiving more congressionally approved
>>>>>> incentives. Dickinson writes: “Top offenders include giants from
>>>>>> high-tech
>>>>>> (Microsoft, $76 billion); Big Pharma (Pfizer, $69 billion); Big Oil
>>>>>> (ExxonMobil, $47 billion); investment banks (Goldman Sachs, $22
>>>>>> billion);
>>>>>> Big Tobacco (Philip Morris, $20 billion); discount retailers (Wal-Mart,
>>>>>> $19
>>>>>> billion); fast-food chains (McDonald's, $16 billion) — even heavy
>>>>>> machinery
>>>>>> (Caterpillar, $17 billion). General Electric has $110 billion stashed
>>>>>> offshore, and enjoys an effective tax rate of 4 percent — 31 points lower
>>>>>> than its statutory obligation to the IRS.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIIr8JHgFYc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -RR
>>>>>>
>>>>>
Other related posts:
