[sparkscoffee] Re: Burger Abandons America

  • From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." <n1ea@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 13:36:52 -0400

Yes, but the "he" that you speak of does not exist, it is "we" the
stockholders.  If management behaves poorly, we can abandon our investment,
sell our shares and reinvest in a corporation that we believe is better.

Or we can bring up behavior of Board or Officers upan Annual Meeting or
fire them.

Please Learn before you Think.

73

DR
 On Sep 1, 2014 12:51 PM, "Redacted sender Sblumen123@xxxxxxx for DMARC" <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  DR
> The consumer not only pays all the cost of productions including corporate
> taxes but for profits
> like dividens for you and others and for new factories and research and
> development and mega yachts
> and executive Jets which all may be made in communist China depending on
> the will of the captalist
> whose motto is, profitism before patriotism. With left over profits he can
> make a free speech contribution
> to the legislators of his choice. Got the picture, think, think, think.
>
> Comrade B, Protectionist Socialist
>
>  In a message dated 8/31/2014 9:20:11 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> djringjr@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> Corporations are owned by people like me and you.  If I get a bigger
> dividend for the money I have invested, I can buy something I need or want.
>
> If a corporation buys a mega jet, they need crew for it, good jobsfor
> talented men and women
>
> If it were the old days they'd need a flight radio officer, maybe it would
> be an ARA job!
>
> With more money corporations can build new factories, invest in reseatch
> and development, buy a ship with R/O job.
>
> High tax rate promotes getting rid of net income by increasing managerial
> pay so there will be no retained (taxable) earnings.  When they do that the
> rich get richer and of course have to pay personal income taxes, but it is
> better for corporation to retain eanings tax free.
>
> Everyone misses the point that Burger King will still pay 100% USA tax to
> IRS for profit from each and every Burger King and USA Tim Horton's, so all
> USA will lose is corporate tax.
>
> Do not attack things you do not understand, when people see you know
> nothing true, they will not vote for you.
>
> That's why many do not vote socialist, communist.
>
> 73
>
> DR
> On Aug 31, 2014 3:30 PM, "Redacted sender Sblumen123@xxxxxxx for DMARC" <
> dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>  DR
>> Are you nuts proposing the fat cats tax to be free so they can buy bigger
>> mega yachts, executive Jets
>> and have a little left over to make contributions to politicians of their
>> choice under the new free
>> speech gift? Even the Republicans don't say that.
>>
>> Comrade B
>>
>>  In a message dated 8/29/2014 6:18:33 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>> n1ea@xxxxxxxx writes:
>>
>> Another reason to reduce corporate tax to ZERO.
>>
>> You do that and there will be such an influx of prosperity and income
>> taxes in USA, your head will spin.
>>
>> Dumb Democrats just do not get economics.
>>
>> DR
>> On Aug 29, 2014 8:55 AM, "Ron Ristad" <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>  As Burger King heads north for Canada's lower corporate tax rate, we
>>> speak to Rolling Stone contributing editor Tim Dickinson about his new
>>> article, "The Biggest Tax Scam Ever." Dickinson reports on how top U.S.
>>> companies are avoiding hundreds of billions of dollars by parking their
>>> profits abroad — and still receiving more congressionally approved
>>> incentives. Dickinson writes: “Top offenders include giants from high-tech
>>> (Microsoft, $76 billion); Big Pharma (Pfizer, $69 billion); Big Oil
>>> (Exxon­Mobil, $47 billion); investment banks (Goldman Sachs, $22 billion);
>>> Big Tobacco (Philip Morris, $20 billion); discount retailers (Wal-Mart, $19
>>> billion); fast-food chains (McDonald's, $16 billion) — even heavy machinery
>>> (Caterpillar, $17 billion). General Electric has $110 billion stashed
>>> offshore, and enjoys an effective tax rate of 4 percent — 31 points lower
>>> than its statutory obligation to the IRS.”
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIIr8JHgFYc
>>>
>>> -RR
>>>
>>

Other related posts: