[sparkscoffee] Re: Already happens: Capitalism destroys human labor force and goes to the next phase

  • From: R George <xgeorge@xxxxxxx>
  • To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 11:59:40 -0700

"102 million working age Americans that do not have a job right now."
RG

On 5/7/2014 11:33 AM, Ron Ristad wrote:
They said the same thing with they invented the combine harvester and the steam engine, etc..

Think of all the Chinese laundrymen that were displaced by the washing machine.

-RR

    -----Original Message-----
    From: R George
    Sent: May 7, 2014 9:23 AM
    To: undisclosed-recipients@null, null@null
    Subject: [sparkscoffee] Already happens: Capitalism destroys human
    labor force and goes to the next phase

    07 May, 2014

    Already happens: Capitalism destroys human labor force and goes to
    the next phase

    Connecting the dots one can discover the most nightmarish
    scenarios. Destructive capitalism's next phase is the total
    substitution of the human labor force with robotic machines, or in
    other words, the hyper-automatization. There is a process taking
    place right now, and no one (or nearly no one) knows what would
    happen after its completion.

    The true picture behind unemployment

    From a latest article in PressTV:

     "Did you know that there are nearly 102 million working age
    Americans that do not have a job right now? And 20 percent of all
    families in the United States do not have a single member that is
    employed. So how in the world can the government claim that the
    unemployment rate has "dropped" to '6.3 percent'?"

    "Well, it all comes down to how you define who is 'unemployed'.
    For example, last month the government moved another 988,000
    Americans into the 'not in the labor force' category."

    
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/05/04/361323/27-million-americans-are-unemployed/

    102(!) million working age Americans that do not have a job right
    now? 20%(!) of all families in the US do not have a single member
    that is employed? Do you find these numbers exaggerated? Maybe
    not, if you read the following story by the "eye-witness" Yanis
    Varoufakis.

    What is going on in front of our eyes?

    Yanis Varoufakis in his article "What if the capital of future
    doesn't need us?", describes what he saw in Austin-Texas and what
    that means:

    "While I was watching from my window in Austin-Texas, I saw a big
    cloud of dust deep in horizon. Two days ago, I was walking in that
    area and I was surprised by the view of the big factory where
    bulldozers and machines were continuously working, producing the
    dust. From the front side of the building under construction it
    was obvious that (fortunately) they were not building a new trade
    center or apartment blocks. No, it was a big industrial center."

    "Although I didn't notice it the first time, after a few seconds I
    realised that something was missing from this factory: people!
    Specifically, I counted three. All of them were wearing helmets
    and protection suits and were located in a small office in a space
    outside with a few computers, while they were covered by a tent
    like those used by the army. Ten bulldozers, three cranes and more
    or less ten moving tools, at least from what I could see, were
    moving without drivers, operators, workers generally."

    "When I returned to my office, I went straight to find a colleague
    who knows well what's going on. He informed me that the workplace
    I saw, was the new factory of Apple to produce MacBook Pro. It was
    true that, it was constructed through almost complete
    automatization. The materials had been selected through a way with
    which, the automatic machines - therefore robots connected to
    eachother through a local wireless network (intranet) - to be able
    to construct without human interference - even the hydraulic
    structure of the building will be constructed by plumpers-robots.
    A factory that under normal conditions should employ thousands of
    workers is functioning with the presence of less than one hundred
    souls."

    "I asked him about the move of Apple to produce computers in
    America, by bringing back in the US the production from China for
    the first time after decades. 'How's that?' And the answer was the
    expected one, although quite impressive: 'Wages are of no
    importance. The export of productive processes from America to
    China (off-shoring) was only an intermediate stage. The production
    has returned to America, but not the jobs. The new factory of
    Apple, not only is constructed without American workers' sweat,
    but will also produce MacBook Pro through complete automatization,
    without hiring Texans. Welcome to the New, Brave World', ended
    with a smile, referring obviously to the Brave New World of Aldous
    Huxley."

    "When bulldozers and plumpers-robots that at this moment build the
    new factory of Apple, will start to learn from eachother and
    cooperate inside a robotic network, even the few jobs concerning
    the operation of these robots will vanish. In case that these
    armies of interconnected machine slaves belonged to everyone, thus
    if everyone had the right to benefit from the goods that they
    produce, then no problem. What should be done, however, in case
    that these machine slaves, the capital of future, belong (like the
    most of today's capital) to the very few, while at the same time
    most of the people do not have access in the goods they produce
    and an opportunity to work for a (human) wage?"

    Source: http://www.lifo.gr/team/apopseis/45702

    Capital "hyperaccumulation" : Useful for the next stage

    Economic crises are used to destroy big competitors and keep the
    value of money high, through capital "hyperaccumulation". Capital
    "hyperaccumulation", however, is also used to fund the next stage
    of the destructive capitalism which is hyper-automatization.

    How all these connected to the Greek experiment?

    How long a society could tolerate an unemployment rate of 30% -
    50% without uprising that could bring an "instability" to the
    system? When unemployment rate for the young people has reached
    60%? When pensions and wages have been cut? How much the
    unemployment benefit should be cut in order to allow people to
    survive and consume without uprising? How many could be left
    totally helpless without any kind of social benefit? How much the
    mainstream media propaganda affects people in order to stay scared
    inside their homes without uprising?

    The new nightmarish facts in Greek experiment could be proved
    quite useful for the big companies that hyper-automatize
    production and seek to remove the human labor costs.

    Someone has to consume

    The big question is: If all the production will be automatized
    (even the services sector), who will consume the products? Are we
    going to a model that most of the people will be receiving
    unemployment benefits just to survive and consume?

    In overpopulated developing countries there are huge potential
    consumer tanks. Their consuming power will rise and the complete
    automatization of the production there will take decades. However,
    the suitable conditions should be created first, in the aged and
    saturated West, in order a limit in wages to be established and
    the expansion of the Western social state model to be prevented
    because all these things mean an additional cost for the global
    economic oligarchy:

    
http://failedevolution.blogspot.gr/2013/12/an-imaginary-dialogue-between-bosses.html

    The new model could lead to a future Dystopia beyond any fantasy:

    "In the middle of the pyramid, a restructured class will serve and
    secure the domination of the top. Corporate executives, big
    journalists, scientific elites, suppression forces. It is
    characteristic that academic research is directed on the basis of
    the profits of big corporations. Funding is directed increasingly
    to practical applications in areas that can bring huge profits,
    like for example, the higher automatization of production and
    therefore, the profit increase through the restriction of jobs."

    *"The base of the pyramid will be consisted by the majority of
    workers in global level, with restricted wages, zero labor rights,
    and nearly zero opportunities for activities other than consumption."*

    *"However, the most horrific thing of all will be the expansion of
    the lower social level, consisted by millions of people all over
    the planet, which will be left without any kind of help, dying in
    extreme poverty, since the global economic elite will secure its
    domination through the oversupply of labor force and consumers.*

    Unfortunately, already, the human life increasingly lose value..."

    
http://failedevolution.blogspot.gr/2014/02/a-more-simple-model-in-favor-of-1.html

    Are they all, so well designed?

    Probably not. One can imagine, more or less, what is being
    discussed in closed rooms of economic forums and Bilderberg
    conferences behind cameras, but that does not mean that the
    designers of the new world order can build everything in detail.

    In many cases in the past, predictions and designs of various
    think tanks have failed because there is no perfect theory that
    can predict everything with accuracy and include all the
    unexpected facts.

    It is obvious that the subsection of the global economic oligarchy
    in Greece, fears a possible "accident" in euro elections since
    things are not going well for the traditional parties in power
    which support the local capital, and this is depicted in the way
    that the mainstream media propaganda culminates as we get closer
    to the euro elections day.

    This means that, the struggle of people against the future
    Dystopia in not futile at all ...

    
http://failedevolution.blogspot.gr/2014/05/already-happens-capitalism-destroys.html


"When you believe in things that you don't understand, then you suffer"
- Stevie Wonder "Superstition"

Other related posts: