[slackintosh-users] Re: How to deal with openssl 32/64bit packages
- From: Adrian Ulrich <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: slackintosh-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:50:05 +0100
> glibc_biarch-something-powerpc64 ? the "_" should be legal in package
It would solve some problems but i don't like magic suffixes :-)
Maybe the most clean approach would be to have powerpc64 packages
include a 32bit and a 64bit version:
Example: openssl-0.98z-powerpc64 would include:
/usr/lib/ <-- 32bit stuff
/usr/lib64 <-- 64bit stuff
/usr/bin/openssl <-- 64bit binary
--
A. Top posters
Q. What's the most annoying thing on Usenet?
Other related posts:
