* Sebastian Bauer <sebauer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Please tell us your opinion about that and also some features which a mail > client must have and SimpleMail doesn't offer yet. First of all, we should make it Shareware to be taken serious. ;) Okay, just a joke. ;) Databug's mail remembered me of the weak folder-settings. A standard-address and a standard-indentity are important, maybe also packing/encoding using xpk. And hey, adding all the features YAM has...have you measured the progress of YAM and the one of SimpleMail in the last 12 months? ;) We are doing our very best but however we can't live from the spirit of free software and have quite a bunch of work. ;) Ergo: SimpleMail Beta surely won't have all the features YAM ha sbuilt up in 5 years or more. ;) However, we have features YAM haven't a I'm pretty sure we brought also life in the YAM-Project, SSL eg. was in SimpleMail before the YAM-team ever heard of it . ;) -- Remember - if all you have is an axe, every problem looks like hours of fun. -- Frossie __________________________________________________________________________ SimpleMail mailing list - //www.freelists.org/list/simplemail-usr Listserver help.: mailto:simplemail-usr-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=HELP Unsub....: mailto:simplemail-usr-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=UNSUBSCRIBE