Devises run great!
-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Scott McMorrow
Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 10:40 AM
To: dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: XTalk power flow in differential vias
When there is no room for stitching vias, then the device itself has a
design problem, and did not account for them in their SI.
Teraspeed Consulting - A Division of Samtec Scott McMorrow, Technical
Director SI/PI Office 401-284-1827 www.teraspeed.com | www.samtec.com
-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Vinu Arumugham
Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 1:33 PM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: XTalk power flow in differential vias
Lee,
"There is no room for "stitching vias'"
There is no free lunch either.
Without stitching vias, interconnect common mode return loss goes up.
Since neither TX nor RX has a perfect common mode termination, common mode
signals will keep reflecting until they are converted into differential or
radiated.
So you pay for it with lower margins or more expensive shielding measures.
Thanks,
Vinu
On 12/07/2016 05:25 PM, heyfitch (Redacted sender heyfitch for DMARC) wrote:
You are free to design your own test board to convince yourself one way oranother. Right?
- VadimÂ<leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2016, 17:01, leeritchey
room for "stitching vias'. Â These all work very well. Â You will find this
Cadin, I do design with hundeds of channels densely packed. Â There is no
Maybe stitching vias are over kill. To use them I would have to be shownthat their effect is significant rather than just visible .
wrote:
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S® 6, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone--------
Original message --------
From: heyfitch <heyfitch@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12/06/2016 8:36 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, shlepnev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] Re: XTalk power flow in differential vias
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted {margin-left:0 !important;border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important;padding-left:1ex
!important;background-color:white;}Lee,In fiber optics modules, for
example, the density is so high that diff vias are often right next to
one another. Â The natural inclination is to have as few stitching
vias as possible - to have more routing channels. Â So, 2 stitching
vias per a diff via is typical. Â Yuriy's video clearly shows how the
lower number of stitching vias result into higher insertion loss. Â
This is a trade off consideration, imho. Also, it is desired to have
less than 40dB crosstalk between channels. That is another
consideration. Regards,Vadim Heyfitch
On Monday, December 5, 2016, 13:49, Lee Ritchey <leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Why are we worrying about differential vias?
-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Yuriy Shlepnev
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 11:58 AM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] XTalk power flow in differential vias
Hello Everyone,
Last Friday I have uploaded visualization of crosstalk power flow in
differential vias - see #2016_13 at
http://www.simberian.com/ScreenCasts.php
 -> How Interconnects Work (higher quality, but may be slow),
YouTube version is available at https://youtu.be/IyuQIl8T_uE The demo ;
video illustrates two ways for the crosstalk reduction. I was really
fascinated with the power flow view of the crosstalk :-) As always, I
will appreciate any feedback.
Best regards,
Yuriy
Yuriy Shlepnev, Ph.D.
President, Simberian Inc.
2629 Townsgate Rd., Suite #235, Westlake Village, CA 91361, USA Office
+1-702-876-2882; Fax +1-702-482-7903 Cell +1-206-409-2368; Virtual
+1-408-627-7706
Skype: shlepnev
www.simberian.com
Simbeor - Accurate, Productive and Cost-Effective Electromagnetic
Signal Integrity Software
2010 and 2011 DesignVision Award Winner, 2015 Best In Design&Test
Finalist
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List forum is accessible at:
       http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list
List archives are viewable at:Â Â
      //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
      http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu Â
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List forum is accessible at:
       http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list
List archives are viewable at:Â Â
      //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
      http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu Â
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List forum is accessible at:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
