Hi Gert: Thank you for you advice, yes , our channel is BGA to MXP connector, and the serdes are on the outer row of the pin map, so the signal can route out on top layer without vias . What block us from use microstrip on this ~4inch channel is , both on simulation and measurement shows that , for M4 material, the Width/Gap =8mil /8mil micostrip have ~ 1.3dB/inch@12.5GHz IL, and a 6mil/8mil stripline just have ~0.8dB/inch @12.5GHz, even consider the via loss , I think stripline still have dominance, so we may use Microstrip even we can route the signal without vias. May be we should ask , does our IL measurement data right ? Best Regards, LIU Luping 2014-07-09 15:26 GMT+08:00 Havermann, Gert <Gert.Havermann@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi LIU, > > the answer was already given in your first link of the SI-List. > It all depends on what and how you are comparing. > > Just use an Impedance calculator and check both options for your Project > with the given restrictions in Stack-up, material, Layer count, EMI > rules... and then you will find the best solution. > > One thing you should keep in mind is the impact of vias. If aou are able > to route the signals without using vias, then Microstrip has advantages. If > your Chip is a BGA and has vias anyway, then stripline should be the best > option as no madditional vias have to be used. > > BR > Gert > > > ---------------------------------------- > Absender ist HARTING Electronics GmbH, MarienwerderstraÃe 3, D-32339 > Espelkamp; Registergericht: Amtsgericht Bad Oeynhausen; Register-Nr.: HRB > 8808; Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Dipl.-Kfm. Edgar-Peter > Düning, Dipl.-Ing. Torsten Ratzmann, Dipl.-Wirtschaftsing. Ralf Martin Klein > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Im Auftrag von Luping Liu > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2014 08:25 > An: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Betreff: [SI-LIST] Stripline vs. Microstrip selection > > Hi All: > I have a few 4 inch 25Gbps channel on my board,the design > requirement is the lowest total loss first, and if possible , use hybrid > stackup to reduce the cost (M6+FR4), but I am not sure if we can use > microstrip to get lowest total loss, some different view points are found : > > 1.For the same trace width and copper thickness considerations,stripline > results in less signal attenuation compared with microstrip. > http://www.altera.com/literature/an/an672.pdf, figure 10 . > > > 2. Stripline more lossy than Microstrip. > > //www.freelists.org/post/si-list/Stripline-more-lossy-than-Microstrip,2 > //www.freelists.org/post/si-list/Microstrip-vs-Stripline,6 > > 3. Microstrip have more impedance variations > 8_FR1Paper_MovingHigherDataRateSerial Designcon2014 > > My question is : > > qs1. Why they have so much difference at IL@ 12.5GHz? if radiation loss > play the role, does it have a knee freq which the microstrip loss over the > stripline? > > qs2. Consider the via loss , is it better to use microstrip to get lowest > loss for this <4 inch channel (all use 8mil width)? > > > Thanks and Regards, > LIU Luping > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List forum is accessible at: > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu