Andrew, We were discussing the feedpoint impedance of an antenna which is a complex scalar quantity and how a portion of that, the radiation resistance, represents the power transfer. When dealing with coupled structures a matrix quantity is used which has the off-diagonal terms of mutual impedance. The phase angle of the mutual impedance relates to the phase shift in the coupling. The feedpoint impedance of a coupled structure has to be computed from the matrix along with the self-impedances of the coupled elements; the feedpoint impedance is not a diagonal term of the matrix. So even with a coupled structure, the radiation resistance is a portion of the feedpoint impedance which represents the radiated power and it is always real valued. If it helps, consider another case of coupled inductors--a transformer. The only power that is transferred is a portion of that where the input voltage and input current are in phase--right? Charles -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Andrew Burnside Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 4:44 AM To: chuck@xxxxxxxxxxx; a.ingraham@xxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Question on EMI radiated power Chuck :My interpretation of a reactive component is energy storage in the near :field surrounding the antenna, and of course there will be no power transfer :due to this. This is completely consistent with energy storage in ::capacitors and inductors. Therefore, there is no such thing as a complex ::radiation impedance. However, the reactive component may relate to any (partial) mutual inductance/capcitance there is to other structures in the near field. Therefore, we don't have an ideal antenna due to the near field loading. When considering EMI, we may well be within the near field range. If we consider digital circuits only for a moment, then the majority of the emissions are likely to be due to clocks / and current dumped down the power supply network. Yes, there may be some direct emissions from interconnects, but these are usually fairly small compared to the PSN, as we aren't talking power electronics here. If we are considering the far field only, then yes it is possible to get away with a resistance only if we are only interested in power transfer. However, I would have thought though that the emission phase is becoming signficant, considering the rise times of some of the signals present. Regards Andrew ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu