Andrew, Well, your view of the radiation resistance is supported by John D. Kraus see "Antennas" page 136 copyright McGraw-Hill 1950 where it says the average of the Poynting vector (power transfer) is .. the average power ... streaming out of a sphere surrounding the dipole." Your view of the radiation resistance being a function of frequency is supported by Robert S. Elliott "Antenna Theory and Design" ISBN 0-13-03836-2 copyright 1981 Prentice-Hall page 302 (where is shows a plot)of the resistance and reactance of a center fed dipole versus length parameterized by diameter. There is no narrowband approximation in the analysis, so the radiation resistance concept holds over frequency. This is also consistent with my experience in building and using antennas. My interpretation of a reactive component is energy storage in the near field surrounding the antenna, and of course there will be no power transfer due to this. This is completely consistent with energy storage in capacitors and inductors. Therefore, there is no such thing as a complex radiation impedance. Regards, Chuck Hill -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Andrew Ingraham Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 6:32 AM To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Question on EMI radiated power > In short, the answer is no. Maybe it's just me ... but I would have worded it differently: that the answer to Doug's question is essentially yes, but that (like so many things in RF) it is a frequency-dependent resistance. At any one frequency, you could come up with a resistance in the circuit that represents the transfer of energy from the circuit into EMI rather than heat. I don't know how useful it would be to determine this radiation resistance, even at a single frequency, unless the EMI is large. So, conceptually yes, but in practice maybe not that useful. But ... Is there such a thing as a complex radiation impedance? If it has an imaginary component, what does it represent? Radiation resistance is a circuit stand-in for the energy (power) that gets radiated from the radiating element. An imaginary component doesn't pass any net (average) power. While it makes sense to have imaginary components of the circuit's impedance due to the structure of the physical device, standing waves, etc., I don't see this as a component of the radiation impedance, which ought to be pure real, shouldn't it? Radiation implies energy radiated outwards, which means power loss from the circuit. Regards, Andy ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu