Ira: With appropriate respect to the prior three respondents, I must offer the following caution. Since each of the PCI chips are expected to be a driver as well as a receiver, a worst-case simulation (per PCI Specification allowable limits) of daisy-chained connections will likely indicate an unacceptable settling condition (caused by reflections) versus time for maximum driver strengths (i.e., lowest allowed source impedance and maximum slew rate). The use of short stubs WITH a series damping resistor at each chip will alleviate this potential error condition (similar to the recommended PCI daughter card design recommendations). As noted by others, as a minimum you should generate models and perform a simulation. Be sure to use the strongest driver model data provided by the respective chip vendor, or preferably use the PCI allowable limits which will allow second source part substitutions if needed downstream. The simulation result may allow deletion of the series damping resistor if the driver is weak enough. Zero-ohm resistors may be used if the layout is done in parallel with your analysis. Also, check to verify any reflections at the individual receivers do not exceed allowable votage-time limits. This condition may arise if a clamp circuit to the positive rail is not included inside the chip. My recent experience (last three months) has shown that a high percentage of chip vendors do NOT meet the PCI Specification limits on drivers, even though they include "PCI" in the name of the chip. Nor do all PCI chips include positive rail clamps. The receiver performance is barely affected by the presence or absence of the series damping resistor. Note also that the use of stubs with damping resistors will likely reduce the total length of the bus relative to the daisy-chain approach. Good Engineering to you, Mike Michael L. Conn Owner/Principal Consultant Mikon Consulting Cell: (408)821-9843 *** Serving Your Needs with Technical Excellence *** ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu