> Thus mode conversion is a mathematical (and physical) model that allows us >to deal with the analysis, rather than an actual physical phenomenon. Yes and no. The case you've described is modelling issue, rather than physical. And some forms of that could be described as "mode conversion", but that is not what the term usually is used to refer to. Consider, a transmission line or waveguide supports various propagating modes. If there is a disruption in the physical structure, then the modes supported in the disrupted section can differ. The original modes each excite one OR MORE of the disrupted section's modes, when then can become differing modes on the lines on either side of the disruption. That is a physical phenomenon, and that is what is more commonly described as mode conversion. Power being transferred into propagating modes that were previously unpowered is the typical form seen. HTH Kevin ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu