[SI-LIST] Re: Capacitors arrays… worth it or not?
- From: Alan.Hiltonnickel@xxxxxxx
- To: JeanPierrePoulin@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 12:21:16 -0700
Hi Jean-Pierre,
I've done spreadsheet analysis before, and it's a useful first
approximation. The problem is that it is difficult to take resonances
into account.
I have not yet read Lee's book, and I'm not sure where he stands on
capacitor selection technique (although I think it's safe to say he's in
favor of it). There seem to be two schools of thought, both of which I
have found useful. You can check the SI-List archives for more details.
I'm sure I won't do justice to either method here.
Under the "Big V" approach (championed most notably and ably by Steve
Weir) you use the largest value capacitors you can find in any
particular size and add them until you reach your target plane impedance
over the frequencies of interest. Although I have used this
successfully, you have to watch out for resonant peaks in the impedance
profile caused by the inductance of a larger cap interacting with the
capacitance of the next smaller cap.
The distributed approach requires choosing multiple values in each size
to create a flat (or nearly so) impedance profile. This approach was
developed by Ray Anderson, Larry Smith, and Tanmoy Roy. The problem I
find with this approach is that the end result can be an impractically
large number of capacitors.
Ultimately you need to simulate and measure. There are several good
simulation tools available. Naming a few off my head, Cadence has a
decent Power Integrity tool, as do SiSoft, Mentor, Ansoft and Sigrity
(This is not a comprehensive list. Google: "Power Integrity"). For any
of these tools to work well, you'll need good models. Once you've built
the board, use a VNA to evaluate your power impedance. The results of
that should inform your decisions on capacitor changes or design changes.
I won't go into placement and connection methods here, I'm sure you're
aware of how crucial it is to keep connection inductance from dominating
capacitor package impedance. Steve's comments elsewhere in this thread
have me wanting to revisit the array and X2Y caps to see if I'm missing
something.
Alan
jeanpierrepoulin wrote On 05/21/06 10:05,:
>Thanks Alan for the recommendations on a formal analysis...
>
>It did seem - given the sub 1ns rise time - that this was required
>even if the two parts are right close to one another... so I've been
>trying to improve on my previous approach (i.e. follow ref design
>and 'sprinkle a few more caps just in case' methodology) to a more
>scientific approach...
>
>Reading on the subject to improve the understanding and reach some
>approximation to science, I have thus far adopted Lee Ritchey's
>approach, added some theory from Dr. Howard Johnson and verified the
>whole thing with an old Micron app note...
>
>However, the 'excel spreadsheet' that resulted is surely not optimal
>and could induce us in some errors...
>
>Are there any tools / methodology you have seen in your travels that
>can assist with capacitor selection for high-speed designs such as
>ours?
>
>Many thanks!
>
> Jean-Pierre
>
>--- In si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alan Hilton-Nickel
><Alan.Hiltonnickel@...> wrote:
>
>
>>Jean-Pierre,
>>
>>You have some analysis to do, both electrical and mechanical.
>>
>>Keep in mind that as the form factor of the capacitor gets
>>
>>
>smaller, the
>
>
>>interconnect inductance becomes more dominant. This means that the
>>lowest-inductance caps should generally be closest to the point of
>>consumption (the chip). This often means underneath the chip. The
>>
>>
>arrays
>
>
>>and the odd form-factor caps may simply not be placeable without
>>eliminating power or ground vias, which at some point defeats the
>>purpose of using low-inductance caps since it increases the
>>
>>
>inductance
>
>
>>of the power-plane connection.
>>
>>I've often seen the arrays and X2Y/LICCs used most effectively on
>>
>>
>the
>
>
>>package, not the board. The higher cost of the parts is a key
>>
>>
>factor as
>
>
>>well.
>>
>>Good luck with this.
>>
>>Alan
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from si-list:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
>For help:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
>
>List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.org
>
>List archives are viewable at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
>
--
Alan Hilton-Nickel
Signal Integrity Engineer
Sun Microsystems Inc.
Netra Systems and Networking
Newark, CA
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
