I cannot find any information on Isola Chronon. Is information publicly available? On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Lee <leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have tested GigaSync and Chronon from Isola. Both of them produced very > good results. Maximum skew over 14" was 2 pSec. Sample size 12. > > I'm not sure what Nelco, Panasonic and others are doing in this area. > Does anyone out there know? > > -----Original Message----- From: Jonas Magnusson > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 7:14 PM > To: leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ; scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ; Carson Au > Cc: Ken Cantrell ; Loyer, Jeff ; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] Re: AW: Glass-Weave Skew / Fiber-Weave Effect > > > Gurus, what is your thoughts on the Isola Gigasync mtrl? > > Cheers, > -- > Jonas Magnusson > Senior Hardware Designer > Teamleader Hardware design > Synopsys Hardware Platforms Group > Synopsys, Inc. > Kalkstensvägen 3 > SE-224 57 LUND > SWEDEN > > Phone : +46-46-16 29 05 > Fax : +46-46-16 29 01 > Cell : +46-70-89 89 774 > E-mail : jonasm@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Web : www.synopsys.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Lee > Sent: den 5 december 2014 17:18 > To: scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Carson Au > Cc: Ken Cantrell; Loyer, Jeff; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: AW: Glass-Weave Skew / Fiber-Weave Effect > > AH! The gods again! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott McMorrow > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 2:50 PM > To: Carson Au > Cc: Ken Cantrell ; Loyer, Jeff ; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: AW: Glass-Weave Skew / Fiber-Weave Effect > > One must be patient and wait for the gods to reveal such a material. > Release is imminent. > > > > > > > Scott McMorrow > Teraspeedî Consulting - A Division of Samtec > 16 Stormy Brook Rd > Falmouth, ME 04105 > (401) 284-1827 Business > http://www.teraspeed.com > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Carson Au <carson.au@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What are these spread-independent materials? I only know of Isola's >> Gigasync. >> >> On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Ken Cantrell <ken@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> Jeff, >>> Give him the money!! :) >>> >>> Ken >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >>> On Behalf Of Scott McMorrow >>> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 3:00 PM >>> To: Loyer, Jeff >>> Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: AW: Glass-Weave Skew / Fiber-Weave Effect >>> >>> Jeff >>> on the shining the light thing, that's called an optical densitometer. >>> you can make one with a calibrated flatbed scanner. Then it's a >>> matter of creating a table of optical density vs Er. It would make >>> for a nice academic study. >>> >>> As for the dozens of materials I've characterized recently, I can >>> tell you that I have a method that provides a very accurate relative >>> figure of merit between weave/resin systems in one trace measurement >>> per laminate stackup, not accounting for non-orthogonality of board >>> and weave. A few more traces and I can adjust for weave/board >>> misalignment. >>> >>> As for something that gives statistically accurate skew spread >>> measurements ... nope. Care to fund the study? I know how to do it. >>> Have >>> known for 10 years I know the quickest methodology to get the >>> statistical results. It's just a matter of sampling quite a few >>> boards. >>> >>> >>> Scott McMorrow >>> TeraspeedÃâî Consulting - A Division of Samtec >>> 16 Stormy Brook Rd >>> Falmouth, ME 04105 >>> (401) 284-1827 Business >>> http://www.teraspeed.com >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Loyer, Jeff <jeff.loyer@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi Scott, >>> > Can you share any of the studies you've performed to characterize >>> > the dozens of materials? I'm especially interested in clever >>> > techniques you might have used to ensure you measured the maximum >>> > for each material, given the statistical nature of the problem >>> > (whenever I think of performing such a study, I am put off by "how >>> > do I ensure my data includes some representative 'worst case'?"). >>> > >>> > To all, >>> > I believe there is extreme ambiguity in the terms used for spread >>> > glass, I would be wary of any particular terminology (is "ultra" >>> > better than "hyper"?). And, even if you do standardize the >>> > definition of "spread", the net effect is going to vary >>> > significantly for the various glass styles >>> > (1080 will probably always be more problematic than 2116, for >>> > instance). I don't know of any method of easily quantifying the >>> > electrical properties of any particular spread glass. There is >>> > work on-going for a visible light test, but as far as I know those >>> > results have not yet been correlated to Vp differences. >>> > BTW, this might be a nice opportunity for a clever person to come >>> > up with an easy (cheap, HVM-compatible) method of shining a light >>> > through glass weaves and quantifying the difference between the >>> > brightest and darkest areas - ideal "spread glass" would have very >>> > little difference, corresponding to very little difference in Vp >>> > across the >>> weave. >>> > And finally, I don't know of any silicon solutions, ours or >>> > otherwise, used explicitly to solve the fiberweave issue. Adaptive >>> > equalization may make it less of an issue than it was previously, > >>> however. >>> > >>> > Jeff Loyer >>> > >>> > >>> > -----Original Message----- >>> > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >>> > On Behalf Of Scott McMorrow >>> > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 5:42 AM >>> > To: Havermann, Gert >>> > Cc: billh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: AW: Glass-Weave Skew / Fiber-Weave Effect >>> > >>> > Gert, >>> > Even flat weaves have skew, as easily evidenced by a picture of the >>> > weave that shows gaps in the overlap of fiber bundles in one direction. >>> > >>> > I've found that the killer problem is skew on line cards causing >>> > diff to common mode conversion that bursts as crosstalk within >>> > connector PTH via fields and connectors themselves, which are not >>> > designed to control common modes. This was seen specifically in a >>> > significant loss of NEXT margin at receivers from Tx or Rx card >>> > skew causing excessive crosstalk in the connector pin fields for a >>> > well-known standard. This required two solutions, one was to >>> > guardband margin to allow for the additional skew caused NEXT. The >>> > other was to use some >>> skew abatement methods. >>> > >>> > Doing 1000's of sensitivity runs I've found that this skew >>> > sensitivity is much worse on cards than it is on backplanes. That >>> > is, the card skew allowance has much less tolerance than does the >>> > backplane or total end-to-end skew. Where the skew is located is >>> > much more important than how much skew there is. >>> > >>> > To put some numbers to this phenomena, a 10G link had 12 ps of >>> > skew, which translates to around -0.7 dB of additional insertion >>> > loss. That is generally not a serious issue for 99.9% of all >>> > designs. However when the effective loss due to crosstalk was >>> > factored in, due to diff to common mode and common mode to diff >>> > conversion, total additional eye >>> loss was -3.9 dB. >>> > which is a huge impairment. >>> > >>> > In the end, the only solution for skew, especially at 28G rates and >>> > above, is to utilize special techniques to mitigate skew on >>> > backplanes, and skew-free materials on cards. I've measured and >>> > characterized dozens of materials and can say that I can easily >>> > demonstrate the potential for any woven PCB laminate to have >>> > significant skew, even those with spread weaves, except for those >>> > laminates that are specifically engineered for zero-skew with >>> > matched >>> glass and resin dielectric constants. >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > >>> > Scott >>> > >>> > Scott McMorrow >>> > TeraspeedÃâî Consulting - A Division of Samtec >>> > 16 Stormy Brook Rd >>> > Falmouth, ME 04105 >>> > (401) 284-1827 Business >>> > http://www.teraspeed.com >>> > >>> > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Havermann, Gert < >>> > Gert.Havermann@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi Bill, >>> > > I've seen it quite often, but I never seen it killing System >>> > > performance as we work with good margin, and the Silicon accepts >>> > > even more skew that expected. >>> > > One Design was not usable due to weave effect skew. It was a TRL >>> > > Cal.Stucture where the shortest line hat skew exceeding the Phase >>> > > difference. After that I redesigned with different Material and >>> > > flat weave Glass, and that worked great. >>> > > >>> > > BR >>> > > Gert >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ---------------------------------------- >>> > > Absender ist HARTING Electronics GmbH, MarienwerderstraÃÆà ¸e 3, >>> > > D-32339 Espelkamp; Registergericht: Amtsgericht Bad Oeynhausen; >>> Register-Nr.: >>> > > HRB 8808; Vertretungsberechtigte GeschÃÆäftsfÃÆührer: >>> > > Dipl.-Kfm. >>> > > Edgar-Peter DÃÆüning, Dipl.-Ing. Torsten Ratzmann, >>> Dipl.-Wirtschaftsing. >>> > > Ralf Martin Klein >>> > > >>> > > -----UrsprÃÆüngliche Nachricht----- >>> > > Von: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> > > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >>> > > Im Auftrag von Bill Hargin (Nan Ya, USA) >>> > > Gesendet: Freitag, 5. Dezember 2014 06:04 >>> > > An: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> > > Betreff: [SI-LIST] Glass-Weave Skew / Fiber-Weave Effect >>> > > >>> > > Hi Folks âââ¬Ã¦ >>> > > >>> > > Iâââ‰â¢m doing a bit of research on glass-weave skew / the >>> > > fiber-weave >>> effect. >>> > > Iâââ‰â¢ve read the articles/presentations, and understand >>> > > the >>> > > nature of the beast, but Iâââ‰â¢m interested in getting data >>> > > from the design >>> trenches. >>> > > >>> > > Are you (or do you believe youâââ‰â¢ve) seen it in your >>> > > designs? >>> > > What >>> > > happened, and how did you resolve it? (E.g., angled routing, >>> > > low-Dk glass, homogeneous resin/glass, etc.) What were the >>> > > characteristics of the material and signals? >>> > > >>> > > I have no idea what Iâââ‰â¢m going to hear in response, but >>> > > if >>> > > you respond offline, Iâââ‰â¢ll hold the info you provide in >>> > > > > >>> confidence. >>> > > If >>> > > you reply publicly âââ‰â¬Å I promise not to share your >>> > > secrets >>> > > beyond the SI-List âââ¬Ã¦ >>> > > >>> > > Bill Hargin >>> > > Director of North American Sales / Marketing Nan Ya Copper-Clad >>> Laminates >>> > > billh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx âââ¬âê 425-301-4425 âââ¬âê >>> > > Skype: >>> > > bill.hargin >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > > - >>> > > To unsubscribe from si-list: >>> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject >>> > > field >>> > > >>> > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>> > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>> > > >>> > > For help: >>> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > List forum is accessible at: >>> > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list >>> > > >>> > > List archives are viewable at: >>> > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>> > > >>> > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>> > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > > - >>> > > To unsubscribe from si-list: >>> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject >>> > > field >>> > > >>> > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>> > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>> > > >>> > > For help: >>> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > List forum is accessible at: >>> > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list >>> > > >>> > > List archives are viewable at: >>> > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>> > > >>> > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>> > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> > To unsubscribe from si-list: >>> > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject >>> > field >>> > >>> > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>> > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>> > >>> > For help: >>> > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >>> > >>> > >>> > List forum is accessible at: >>> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list >>> > >>> > List archives are viewable at: >>> > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>> > >>> > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>> > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >>> >>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>> >>> For help: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >>> >>> >>> List forum is accessible at: >>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list >>> >>> List archives are viewable at: >>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>> >>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >>> >>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>> >>> For help: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >>> >>> >>> List forum is accessible at: >>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list >>> >>> List archives are viewable at: >>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>> >>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List forum is accessible at: > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2015.0.5577 / Virus Database: 4235/8686 - Release Date: 12/05/14 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List forum is accessible at: > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2015.0.5577 / Virus Database: 4235/8688 - Release Date: 12/05/14 > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu