Jonas It is as good as they say it is. Near zero skew. Scott Scott McMorrow Teraspeed® Consulting - A Division of Samtec 16 Stormy Brook Rd Falmouth, ME 04105 (401) 284-1827 Business http://www.teraspeed.com On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Jonas Magnusson < Jonas.Magnusson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Gurus, what is your thoughts on the Isola Gigasync mtrl? > > Cheers, > -- > Jonas Magnusson > Senior Hardware Designer > Teamleader Hardware design > Synopsys Hardware Platforms Group > Synopsys, Inc. > Kalkstensvägen 3 > SE-224 57 LUND > SWEDEN > > Phone : +46-46-16 29 05 > Fax : +46-46-16 29 01 > Cell : +46-70-89 89 774 > E-mail : jonasm@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Web : www.synopsys.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Lee > Sent: den 5 december 2014 17:18 > To: scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Carson Au > Cc: Ken Cantrell; Loyer, Jeff; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: AW: Glass-Weave Skew / Fiber-Weave Effect > > AH! The gods again! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott McMorrow > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 2:50 PM > To: Carson Au > Cc: Ken Cantrell ; Loyer, Jeff ; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: AW: Glass-Weave Skew / Fiber-Weave Effect > > One must be patient and wait for the gods to reveal such a material. > Release is imminent. > > > > > > > Scott McMorrow > Teraspeedî Consulting - A Division of Samtec > 16 Stormy Brook Rd > Falmouth, ME 04105 > (401) 284-1827 Business > http://www.teraspeed.com > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Carson Au <carson.au@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > What are these spread-independent materials? I only know of Isola's > > Gigasync. > > > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Ken Cantrell <ken@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > >> Jeff, > >> Give him the money!! :) > >> > >> Ken > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > >> On Behalf Of Scott McMorrow > >> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 3:00 PM > >> To: Loyer, Jeff > >> Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: AW: Glass-Weave Skew / Fiber-Weave Effect > >> > >> Jeff > >> on the shining the light thing, that's called an optical densitometer. > >> you can make one with a calibrated flatbed scanner. Then it's a > >> matter of creating a table of optical density vs Er. It would make > >> for a nice academic study. > >> > >> As for the dozens of materials I've characterized recently, I can > >> tell you that I have a method that provides a very accurate relative > >> figure of merit between weave/resin systems in one trace measurement > >> per laminate stackup, not accounting for non-orthogonality of board > >> and weave. A few more traces and I can adjust for weave/board > misalignment. > >> > >> As for something that gives statistically accurate skew spread > >> measurements ... nope. Care to fund the study? I know how to do it. > >> Have > >> known for 10 years I know the quickest methodology to get the > >> statistical results. It's just a matter of sampling quite a few > >> boards. > >> > >> > >> Scott McMorrow > >> TeraspeedÃâî Consulting - A Division of Samtec > >> 16 Stormy Brook Rd > >> Falmouth, ME 04105 > >> (401) 284-1827 Business > >> http://www.teraspeed.com > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Loyer, Jeff <jeff.loyer@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> > >> > Hi Scott, > >> > Can you share any of the studies you've performed to characterize > >> > the dozens of materials? I'm especially interested in clever > >> > techniques you might have used to ensure you measured the maximum > >> > for each material, given the statistical nature of the problem > >> > (whenever I think of performing such a study, I am put off by "how > >> > do I ensure my data includes some representative 'worst case'?"). > >> > > >> > To all, > >> > I believe there is extreme ambiguity in the terms used for spread > >> > glass, I would be wary of any particular terminology (is "ultra" > >> > better than "hyper"?). And, even if you do standardize the > >> > definition of "spread", the net effect is going to vary > >> > significantly for the various glass styles > >> > (1080 will probably always be more problematic than 2116, for > >> > instance). I don't know of any method of easily quantifying the > >> > electrical properties of any particular spread glass. There is > >> > work on-going for a visible light test, but as far as I know those > >> > results have not yet been correlated to Vp differences. > >> > BTW, this might be a nice opportunity for a clever person to come > >> > up with an easy (cheap, HVM-compatible) method of shining a light > >> > through glass weaves and quantifying the difference between the > >> > brightest and darkest areas - ideal "spread glass" would have very > >> > little difference, corresponding to very little difference in Vp > >> > across the > >> weave. > >> > And finally, I don't know of any silicon solutions, ours or > >> > otherwise, used explicitly to solve the fiberweave issue. Adaptive > >> > equalization may make it less of an issue than it was previously, > however. > >> > > >> > Jeff Loyer > >> > > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > >> > On Behalf Of Scott McMorrow > >> > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 5:42 AM > >> > To: Havermann, Gert > >> > Cc: billh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: AW: Glass-Weave Skew / Fiber-Weave Effect > >> > > >> > Gert, > >> > Even flat weaves have skew, as easily evidenced by a picture of the > >> > weave that shows gaps in the overlap of fiber bundles in one > direction. > >> > > >> > I've found that the killer problem is skew on line cards causing > >> > diff to common mode conversion that bursts as crosstalk within > >> > connector PTH via fields and connectors themselves, which are not > >> > designed to control common modes. This was seen specifically in a > >> > significant loss of NEXT margin at receivers from Tx or Rx card > >> > skew causing excessive crosstalk in the connector pin fields for a > >> > well-known standard. This required two solutions, one was to > >> > guardband margin to allow for the additional skew caused NEXT. The > >> > other was to use some > >> skew abatement methods. > >> > > >> > Doing 1000's of sensitivity runs I've found that this skew > >> > sensitivity is much worse on cards than it is on backplanes. That > >> > is, the card skew allowance has much less tolerance than does the > >> > backplane or total end-to-end skew. Where the skew is located is > >> > much more important than how much skew there is. > >> > > >> > To put some numbers to this phenomena, a 10G link had 12 ps of > >> > skew, which translates to around -0.7 dB of additional insertion > >> > loss. That is generally not a serious issue for 99.9% of all > >> > designs. However when the effective loss due to crosstalk was > >> > factored in, due to diff to common mode and common mode to diff > >> > conversion, total additional eye > >> loss was -3.9 dB. > >> > which is a huge impairment. > >> > > >> > In the end, the only solution for skew, especially at 28G rates and > >> > above, is to utilize special techniques to mitigate skew on > >> > backplanes, and skew-free materials on cards. I've measured and > >> > characterized dozens of materials and can say that I can easily > >> > demonstrate the potential for any woven PCB laminate to have > >> > significant skew, even those with spread weaves, except for those > >> > laminates that are specifically engineered for zero-skew with > >> > matched > >> glass and resin dielectric constants. > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > > >> > Scott > >> > > >> > Scott McMorrow > >> > TeraspeedÃâî Consulting - A Division of Samtec > >> > 16 Stormy Brook Rd > >> > Falmouth, ME 04105 > >> > (401) 284-1827 Business > >> > http://www.teraspeed.com > >> > > >> > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Havermann, Gert < > >> > Gert.Havermann@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi Bill, > >> > > I've seen it quite often, but I never seen it killing System > >> > > performance as we work with good margin, and the Silicon accepts > >> > > even more skew that expected. > >> > > One Design was not usable due to weave effect skew. It was a TRL > >> > > Cal.Stucture where the shortest line hat skew exceeding the Phase > >> > > difference. After that I redesigned with different Material and > >> > > flat weave Glass, and that worked great. > >> > > > >> > > BR > >> > > Gert > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > ---------------------------------------- > >> > > Absender ist HARTING Electronics GmbH, MarienwerderstraÃÆà ¸e 3, > >> > > D-32339 Espelkamp; Registergericht: Amtsgericht Bad Oeynhausen; > >> Register-Nr.: > >> > > HRB 8808; Vertretungsberechtigte GeschÃÆäftsfÃÆührer: > >> > > Dipl.-Kfm. > >> > > Edgar-Peter DÃÆüning, Dipl.-Ing. Torsten Ratzmann, > >> Dipl.-Wirtschaftsing. > >> > > Ralf Martin Klein > >> > > > >> > > -----UrsprÃÆüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > Von: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > >> > > Im Auftrag von Bill Hargin (Nan Ya, USA) > >> > > Gesendet: Freitag, 5. Dezember 2014 06:04 > >> > > An: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > > Betreff: [SI-LIST] Glass-Weave Skew / Fiber-Weave Effect > >> > > > >> > > Hi Folks âââ¬Ã¦ > >> > > > >> > > Iâââ‰â¢m doing a bit of research on glass-weave skew / the > >> > > fiber-weave > >> effect. > >> > > Iâââ‰â¢ve read the articles/presentations, and understand > >> > > the > >> > > nature of the beast, but Iâââ‰â¢m interested in getting > >> > > data > >> > > from the design > >> trenches. > >> > > > >> > > Are you (or do you believe youâââ‰â¢ve) seen it in your > >> > > designs? > >> > > What > >> > > happened, and how did you resolve it? (E.g., angled routing, > >> > > low-Dk glass, homogeneous resin/glass, etc.) What were the > >> > > characteristics of the material and signals? > >> > > > >> > > I have no idea what Iâââ‰â¢m going to hear in response, > >> > > but if > >> > > you respond offline, Iâââ‰â¢ll hold the info you provide in > confidence. > >> > > If > >> > > you reply publicly âââ‰â¬Å I promise not to share your > >> > > secrets > >> > > beyond the SI-List âââ¬Ã¦ > >> > > > >> > > Bill Hargin > >> > > Director of North American Sales / Marketing Nan Ya Copper-Clad > >> Laminates > >> > > billh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx âââ¬âê 425-301-4425 âââ¬âê > >> > > Skype: > >> > > bill.hargin > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > - > >> > > To unsubscribe from si-list: > >> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject > >> > > field > >> > > > >> > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > >> > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > >> > > > >> > > For help: > >> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > List forum is accessible at: > >> > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > >> > > > >> > > List archives are viewable at: > >> > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > >> > > > >> > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > >> > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > - > >> > > To unsubscribe from si-list: > >> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject > >> > > field > >> > > > >> > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > >> > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > >> > > > >> > > For help: > >> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > List forum is accessible at: > >> > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > >> > > > >> > > List archives are viewable at: > >> > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > >> > > > >> > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > >> > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > To unsubscribe from si-list: > >> > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject > >> > field > >> > > >> > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > >> > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > >> > > >> > For help: > >> > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > >> > > >> > > >> > List forum is accessible at: > >> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > >> > > >> > List archives are viewable at: > >> > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > >> > > >> > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > >> > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> To unsubscribe from si-list: > >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > >> > >> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > >> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > >> > >> For help: > >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > >> > >> > >> List forum is accessible at: > >> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > >> > >> List archives are viewable at: > >> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > >> > >> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> To unsubscribe from si-list: > >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > >> > >> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > >> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > >> > >> For help: > >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > >> > >> > >> List forum is accessible at: > >> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > >> > >> List archives are viewable at: > >> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > >> > >> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > >> > >> > >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List forum is accessible at: > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2015.0.5577 / Virus Database: 4235/8686 - Release Date: 12/05/14 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List forum is accessible at: > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu