[ SHOWGSD-L ] Slight correction to Evan`s post!!!!!!
- From: "Cudjoegsd" <cudjoegsd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "showgsd-l" <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 13:53:14 -0600
In his last post Evan commented on missing teeth:
<<<As a judge, I can't remember the last time I saw a missing tooth. Also, the
standard calls anything other than missing pre-molars a serious fault. That
always meant to me, that missing pre-molars was not a serious fault. I would
not fault to any great degree a missing pre-molar. So, having said that, I
will probably get all the dogs with missing teeth the next time I judge. If
they are great in other respects, bring them on.<<<<
The Standard actually states "Any teeth other than FIRST premolars is a serious
fault". As a retired oral surgeon, I could not let that erroneous comment slip
past without a correction. No offense intended, Evan. D.D.
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2007. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org
============================================================================
Other related posts:
