[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: SOD SOD SOD
- From: "Chris S. Kimerer" <tanbarkgsd@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Stormy Hope <stormy435@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
Stormy
None of us are perfect, and we all have our personal lives as well. I was not
trying to point fingers, just some constructive criticism and bringing
awareness to issues at hand.
A lot of this could have been avoided if information had been distributed thru
Constant Contact to let those attending know about several issues, the sod
being one of them. As one of the board members pointed out, for the last 45
years (20 that I've attended now) all but 4 times has the conformation ring not
been sod. So making that major of a change and not informing anyone was one of
those judgement errors that caused quite a bit of unnecessary distress for all
involved. Thank goodness a very generous person provided an out for what might
have been a disaster.
Anyway, hopefully this will be a successful National for the GSDCA and now it's
time to move forward.
Take care
Chris
Chris S. (Jolley) Kimerer
www.tanbarkgsd.com
Ch. Tanbark's 2MuchBling Joelle Aramist OFA H/E
Ch. Trotwood's Emerald v Tanbark Joelle Aramist
AOE Sel.Ex.Ch.Carousel Farms Samantha, PT, TC OFA H/E
Ch. CaralonQED JD Drew Bleibtreu, RN OFA H/E
Ch. Cresther's Blast of Kenlyn, HI, CDX, OFA
From: Stormy Hope <stormy435@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: tanbarkgsd@xxxxxxxxx
>Cc: The List <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 3:39 PM
>Subject: Re: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: SOD SOD SOD
>
>I know one area (other than the National section) that is not up to date in
>the P&P and it's totally and completely my fault. The BOD voted in a
>Legislation Liaison and that person (ooops,me:) has not written the guidelines
>for the position. Easy enough to do with AKC's guidelines already there, but
>I haven't done it. So maybe while you are all at the National, I can work on
>that. The Board also voted in a Legislation Committee, and if that comes to
>pass (chair??? and organization) those guidelines need to be in the P&P, too.
>
>Storm
>
>
>On Sep 21, 2011, at 1:21 PM, Chris S. Kimerer wrote:
>
>That actually does make sense, and I have no real problem with that. But like
>in the case last week, the By-Laws were not specific enough to deal with a
>time sensitive issue or emergency, and the P & P is not current in some
>aspects.
>
>Anyway, I do think the outcome was for the good of the dogs, the exhibitors
>and everyone involved in the conformation part of our National. Sometimes it
>takes a certain set of circumstances to see where improvement needs to be
>addressed.
>
>Regards
>
>Chris
>Chris S. (Jolley) Kimerer
>www.tanbarkgsd.com
>
>Ch. Tanbark's 2MuchBling Joelle Aramist OFA H/E
>Ch. Trotwood's Emerald v Tanbark Joelle Aramist
>
>
>
>
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2011. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post. This group and its
administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in
any post.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org
SUBSCRIPTION:http://showgsd.org/mail.html
NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
============================================================================
Other related posts:
