[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Im just saying
- From: randall chesnut <rchesnut70518@xxxxxxx>
- To: "edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx" <edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx>, freelist <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:31:37 +0000 (UTC)
|
|
| |
|
|
| I would say no to the first part, and probably to the second part. I
noticed the same thing you did in the videos. Most of the ones shown were
lacking in rear drive, and high in the rear end in motion. The angulation in
the rear was certainly not what we have today. Good or bad? You be the judge.
Randy C. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Stationery, an att.net Mail and Paperless Post collaboration |
|
On Tuesday, March 31, 2015 12:27 PM, "edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx"
<edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have often referred to the standard as a "moving target"... And this
reference was NOT my original thought ( I don't have many), it was told and
explained to me by a great breeder who is not on this list so I'll leave
his/her name out of this discussion. I think you'd all agree that we created
the standard and we can, and have in the past, change it again! .... If we WANT
to! I looked at the 1974 video ( thanks Linda) and those dogs don't look like
most of the dogs I saw two days ago in Sacramento! Now that video was 41 years
ago... Could most of the 1974 dogs win today? Could most of the dogs today win
in 1974?... I say no to both questions, the two TARGETS are different (
moving)... But what the hell do I know... I'm just a cook..... Changing the
subject I forgot to tell you yesterday what the sperm VET told us at the end of
his presentation!..... " just remember, when your feeling down and having a bad
day, your life began as being the fastest strongest sperm in the village"....
FB
Sent from Xfinity Connect Mobile App
Other related posts:
