I agree with much of what you said, Kathleen. In hindsight, it is obvious there was not sufficient structure, due diligences or communication. Since the GSDCA is not proficient in the purchasing and RFP world, there was not a clear process in place to do it right, which is not surprising under the circumstances. The entire Board does need to accept responsibility for the fact that mistakes were made, but it was not anyone's fault. I am sure everyone involved had good and honest intentions. Unfortunately, it is hard to know what you don't know, and that is why and how procedures and processes evolve - by learning from mistakes. We meant well. It didn't work out so wonderfully. In hindsight, it is obvious that there we should have spent more time, done more analysis, had more interaction with all the vendors, and should have at least had the advice of someone who does this stuff all the time. Throwing out the high and low bid, when you think about it, makes a huge amount of sense, particularly if the low bid is extremely low. Thinking about it, it is comparable to the real estate world. When you do an appraisal or take some other measures to determine market value, you stay with the the middle of the range - generally there is something problematic with the properties that are out of range, on either end. Because of the fact that none of us on the Board (as far as I know ) had prior meaningful experience with this process, and because of the fact there was not a lot of time to reflect or analyze, we did not realize what, in hindsight, looks obvious. If a bid is too low, that is a good indication of a problem. In this case, it may well be that the problem was solely miscommunication, a lack of information which the company used to develop its bid, or some other perfectly innocent breakdown, but it is clear that there was a breakdown. In the world of purchasing, everyone on the Board was a newbie. If you all think back to the days when you were a newbie in dogs, you made lots of mistakes I'm sure. I know I did....! Margy -----Original Message----- From: showgsd-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:showgsd-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kathaleen Strong Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 11:00 AM To: DaniaKarloff@xxxxxxx; showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: BALLOTS/LONG Dania: Thank you very much for your response to the list. As in typical fashion, you are concise as you can be with the facts of the situation and explain things as you see it. I also personally have been involved in many RFPs and bid contracts. While there are usual procedures that business people use during the negotiation phase of these bid contracts, it is not uncommon that the vendors who get the job do not deliver satisfactorily. I agree with Dania, in most cases this is a DIRECT RESULT of miscommunication of service needed and/or expectation on the part of the CUSTOMER. In other words, just because you've done it over and over again with one vendor, when you're using a new vendor, every dot must be dotted and every "T" must be crossed to insure that the vendor is given the opportunity to do the job as you expect. I can not even remotely imagine that any vendor would want to take on a job and do it shabbily, at the risk of their reputation being ruined; especially in this day of swift communication. In this particular case, was the vendor given the ALL of the appropriate parameters before they submitted their bid? I keep hearing on the list that this vendor just "appeared" with a bid. If that's the case, how did they know what specifics they were they were bidding on? Who was the contact person they got this information from and was this the same person who gave all the other companies who submitted bids and was the information the same for all companies? Reading between the lines from the posts of the "people in the know" it leads me to believe that they are trying to PIN this job being botched on someone who happened to speak with this vendor at the National last year... WRONG FOLKS... In the format of this club, the decision to go with this vendor needs to be laid at the feet of the entire board. Sad to say, if you guys accept the shovels of mushroom fodder fed to you instead of demanding for all the facts prior to making a decision (in the form of paperwork with the actual bids in front of you), then you're just as much to blame as the fodder feeders. Now... there was one other thing in Dania's post that really intrigued me. "This has been the nastiest, ugliest election I have ever witnessed and the taste in my mouth is getting much too sour." I totally agree. I can not believe the ridiculous low levels this election has sunk to on the part of the power mongers and their marionettes. But I'm going to stop this post now. Regards, Kathaleen ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2005. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org ============================================================================ ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2005. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org ============================================================================