[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: BALLOTS/LONG
- From: "Kathaleen Strong" <inflight2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <DaniaKarloff@xxxxxxx>, <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 07:59:51 -0700
Dania:
Thank you very much for your response to the list. As in typical fashion,
you are concise as you can be with the facts of the situation and explain
things as you see it.
I also personally have been involved in many RFPs and bid contracts. While
there are usual procedures that business people use during the negotiation
phase of these bid contracts, it is not uncommon that the vendors who get
the job do not deliver satisfactorily. I agree with Dania, in most cases
this is a DIRECT RESULT of miscommunication of service needed and/or
expectation on the part of the CUSTOMER. In other words, just because
you've done it over and over again with one vendor, when you're using a new
vendor, every dot must be dotted and every "T" must be crossed to insure
that the vendor is given the opportunity to do the job as you expect. I can
not even remotely imagine that any vendor would want to take on a job and do
it shabbily, at the risk of their reputation being ruined; especially in
this day of swift communication.
In this particular case, was the vendor given the ALL of the appropriate
parameters before they submitted their bid? I keep hearing on the list that
this vendor just "appeared" with a bid. If that's the case, how did they
know what specifics they were they were bidding on? Who was the contact
person they got this information from and was this the same person who gave
all the other companies who submitted bids and was the information the same
for all companies?
Reading between the lines from the posts of the "people in the know" it
leads me to believe that they are trying to PIN this job being botched on
someone who happened to speak with this vendor at the National last year...
WRONG FOLKS... In the format of this club, the decision to go with this
vendor needs to be laid at the feet of the entire board. Sad to say, if you
guys accept the shovels of mushroom fodder fed to you instead of demanding
for all the facts prior to making a decision (in the form of paperwork with
the actual bids in front of you), then you're just as much to blame as the
fodder feeders.
Now... there was one other thing in Dania's post that really intrigued me.
"This has been the nastiest, ugliest election I have ever witnessed and the
taste in my mouth is getting much too sour."
I totally agree. I can not believe the ridiculous low levels this election
has sunk to on the part of the power mongers and their marionettes.
But I'm going to stop this post now.
Regards,
Kathaleen
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2005. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org
============================================================================
Other related posts:
