[sac-board] Re: Transferring sac-treasurer from Paul to Al
- From: "Tejera, Rick" <rtejera@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:49:34 -0500
As I said, It's just a thought. I agree that we should put it on the agenda
for the next board meeting and leave it at that for now. Figure 20 minutes
on the docket??
Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Dickson [mailto:dickson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 1:45 PM
To: SAC-Board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-board] Re: Transferring sac-treasurer from Paul to Al
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:44:37 -0500, Tejera, Rick wrote:
> If we are going to do this for Al and the position of treasurer, Why not
do
> this for all board positions, i.e. SAC-President, SAC-VP etc? This would
> provide a permanent e-mail address for vital personnel that can be
directed
> to whomever occupies the position. Sounds like an efficient and relatively
> inexpensive way to ensure people can contact us.
E-mail addresses for the other officers should be addressed at the April
board meeting. Remember, they are $15/year. What about committees? I'd
expect Public Events should be third highest in priority (first and second
would be treasurer and president). The letterhead currently has 10
people. I doubt we can spend $150/year on this. I personally suggest
just having the three I've just mentioned.
To preempt the suggestion of using saguaroastro.org, pobox.com provides a
lot more flexibility. My permanentmail.com address has had the
destination mailbox on 6 differnent hosts, including saguarastro.org at
one time. All adjustable by me.
We could get by by just using saguaroastro.org and just having a POP3
mailbox. The passwords would have to handed over (or changed) for each
officer change (more work for Bob Erdmann) and it would be difficult to
overlap usage of a mailbox during a transition (an incoming officer
downloads and deletes a message that's part of a discussion with the
outgoing officer. This could cause some confusion, if not problems). But
it could be done.
-Paul
Other related posts:
