[rollei_list] Re: time for show and......

  • From: Don Williams <dwilli10@xxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 20:02:20 -0500

At 07:42 PM 6/1/2016, Richard wrote:

I belong to about twenty mailing lists. Nearly all now allow binary attachments including JPGs. Most modern mail clients can be set to ignore posts over a certain size or eliminate attachments. Until a year or so ago I was on a dial-up, very slow so attachments were a PITA. I am now on a DSL with about a 20Mb download rate so attachments don't bother me.

That is remarkable for DSL.  (Copper all the way?)

Actually I think DSL has a copper distance limit, forgot the number, bet Dick knows. ATT DSL sales guys come by every few months and I ask them "Where is the fiber-to-copper transition?" They haven't the slightest idea what I'm talking about but I know it's far beyond the standard distance DSL copper limit. Every slightly technical person in this relatively new development has gone from cable, to DSL, to satellite, and then returned to cable.

In my case I just down-sized my Cox cable speed to save a few bucks because I don't need what they offer. Three of the 4 computers in this house are on a wireless router working through walls, etc, and they still get 20-30 Mb/sec downloads.* Upload is slower but that's generally transparent to me. A lot of the uploads run in the background anyhow.

The slow lists are those that retain, on line, everything that has been posted, and you have to wait for a full thread to download before you can start doing anything, lucky we don't have that version.

DAW

*Notice the lower case "b".

Other related posts: