[rollei_list] Re: prove it !
- From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:07:49 -0800
Cheapest? Wow! That is pretty good Nick. You obviously have deeper
pockets than I. IMO, and again I stress IMO, spending that much on a
film camera seems overkill for typical snapshots. You can do the same
using a much less expensive Leica Minilux, at least that is what HCB
did in his remaining years. Again, just my opinion, so please do not
read it differently.
Peter K
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:39:57 +0100 (BST), Nick Roberts
<nickbroberts@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Expensive, Peter? My M6 is probably my cheapest
> camera, along with my Rolleis, in that I can easily
> sell it for what I paid for it. Capital-intensive,
> certainly, but not expensive.
>=20
> Nick
>=20
> --- "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hey Ken,=3D20
> >
> > Good for you. If you like it and can justify the
> > exhorbitant price by
> > saying that, that is wonderful. To each his own
> > though. You indicate
> > "your Nikons." There are other cameras that can do
> > as well or better
> > and cost a hell of a lot less. Yes, they may not be
> > as quiet, but many
> > come close for a smaller price.
> >
> > I would say you are paid quite well to buy an
> > expensive toy like that.=3D20
> >
> > Peter K
>=20
> Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.co=
m
>=20
>=20
--=20
Peter K
=D3=BF=D5=AC
Other related posts:
