[rollei_list] Re: Rollei Planars
- From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 22:53:27 -0700
Because they are both good for different reasons. I agree here too. I
prefer the 2.8 Planar as I like the wide open look of the Planar. And
when stopped down it is very hard to better a Tessar.
On 5/25/05, Ardeshir Mehta <ardeshir@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>=20
> On 25-May-05, at 7:13 PM, Eric Goldstein wrote:
>=20
> > I myself and partial to the 2.8 Planar and 3.5 Tessar.
>=20
> May I ask why? (Just wondering.)
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ---
> Rollei List
>=20
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>=20
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>=20
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>=20
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>=20
>=20
--=20
Peter K
=D3=BF=D5=AC
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
