I think it's really funny that you guys spend so much time arguing
(yes, arguing) about which is "best".
Since when did the sharpest, most colour saturated picture equate
with
"best?"
Since when did LPM resolution equate with "best"?
Boys and their toys, always got to argue over who's got the biggest
baddest equipment. :-)
How can you quantify "art", an essentially subjective endeavor? (Look
at Sanders images. Look at Daniels images. See what I mean?)
Use what you like. It's the result that counts, how you get there is
your own business. There is no best, only what works well for you.
That might not be (indeed, is most certainly not) what works well for
me. Live and let live.
Have a good weekend,
Thor
Plenty of times.
Plenty of times when you're choosing between two images the one you
go with
is the one which is the most clear. Clarity. There are times when
spontaneity wins out. And you don't even care if you've really got
your
focus. But in just as many probably more times what makes a shot a
winner
of the others is the shot which is the most clear. The shot in which
the
subject jumps out the best.
Clarity normally involves such trifles as resolution, sharpness,
acutance,
Saturation.
So you try to pick out a lens which gives you the best results. You
try to
pick out the best lens.
That's right!
The tools you use to do a job counts.
Mark William Rabiner
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into
www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
