Yet to be noted is the exceptional challenge of making optical prints from glass plates. They have a lot of contrast and require special printing out paper. Even with that special paper, it takes a master printer to get an exceptional piece. If done digitally, you would want to use a HDR methodology, marry the scans and control contrast from there... Eric Goldstein -- On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Don Williams <dwilli10@xxxxxxx> wrote: > At 04:49 PM 7/28/2010, David Sadowski wrote, in part: > > As for the detailed printing instructions someone referred to, what > Adams did in 1937 may have been different than what he did in 1977. > Maybe he did have detailed instructions that got separated from these > negs, or maybe they were destroyed in that 1937 fire. Or maybe the > detailed instructions were something that came later in his career. > > > ------------------------------ > I wrote that memory, as told to me by a wonderful close friend who I went > to school with in Oklahoma, starting with the 1st grade and continuing > through college, the difference is that he studied medicine so we eventually > went to different physical locations the last 2-3 years. > > My late friend eventually became chief of staff at a hospital in Santa > Clara, CA, and we saw each other about every year or two until he passed > away around year 2,000. > > I would tend to assume that it was only late in his career that Adams > stopped doing his own prints and thus the detailed instructions came into > being. My friend used the terms "negative" and "envelope" and since he was > a photographer in his own right, would surely have used "plate" if they had > been glass. I am certain the print was one of the more famous ones but not > the most famous. I think he paid on the order of $150 for it and there were > others that sold for quite a bit more. > > I will send a note to his son and find out specifically which picture my > friend bought. > > DAW >