Doesn't some part of you want that same camera without the scratch on the lens? Jeffery Smith New Orleans, LA http://www.400tx.com http://400tx.blogspot.com/ -----Original Message----- From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Sintchak Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 5:34 PM To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [rollei_list] My 2.8E needs a $210 fix job? Do it, or get another? Any advice or input appreciated. About 4 years ago I bought a real beater Rolleiflex 2.8E Planar from a used camera booth in Beijing (I was living there at the time). It was ugly as sin, had some slow speed issues, a small scratch on the front element, but seemed to focus well so I took it--for $150 USD. For while I shot it at 1/60th above and it gave me excellent results--no evidence of the front element scratch either. Sharp as a tack and gorgeous negs. I did get a CLA about 8 months ago from a shop that I'll never go back to, won't get into that now, but he did fix the speeds and all seemed ok. That cost about $160 USD. All was going along fairly well, and I've put through at least 30 rolls since the CLA, until the other day when I fired off a shot, spun the film advance and all locked up about half-way through the spin--- shutter wide open, film advance arm locked tight and would not move. I just brought it to a guy who did great work on my SL66 and after looking it over he says he can get it all back in order......for $210 USD. Ok, in retrospect I probably should have spent $500 USD four years ago on a nice condition one but I am where I am. I starting to wonder though: I've seen what seems to be some pretty good Rolleiflex TLRs going for about $300- 400 USD on eBay and I'm starting to think maybe I should save the $210 USD, add about $300 or so and get me a newer and hopefully better-conditioned Rolleiflex 2.8 Planar/Xenotar be it a C, D, E, E2 or even an F. I simply LOVE Rolleiflex TLRs and plan to use it for years and years to come. I have Bay III hoods, filters, etc. so want to stick to this size lens and the Rolleiflex brand. I guess if I was assured or confident that this $210 USD would be about all I'd need to spend and the camera would be fine going forward (except for the occiasional CLA) I'd stick with it and save the xtra dough. But I'm wavering. Your thoughts? thanks, Richard S. --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list