[rollei_list] Re: Film Lenses and Digital Lenses

  • From: Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:39:06 +0100

Hi Marc,
Did you read the link? It is quite long, and discusses items I will never buy, but it is most informative if one is interested in the technical side of things.
Frank

On 23 Sep, 2009, at 05:53, Marc James Small wrote:

At 12:38 AM 9/23/2009, Frank Dernie wrote:
>Hi Peter,
>Surely you mean the reverse?
>Film flatness has always been a potential problem, particularly with
>larger formats, and the emulsion of film is effectively "thick"
>compared to the plane on which a lens must focus for a digital sensor. >Digital therefore becomes much more sensitive to focus errors and lens
>shortcomings. Film is much more forgiving.
>In case you missed it the first time I posted the link, there is an
>interesting essay on the difficulty of realising the full potential of
>digital systems here:-

Frank

You are essentially correct. All lenses produce a spherical focal "plane", even APO corrected "flat-field" lenses. This was a problem with early lenses which often displayed out-of-focus areas at the edge of the image but the improvement in lens designs and in emulsion speeds allowed depth-of-focus to disguise the effect. Still, it remained an issue on fast Schmidt astro telescopes, which required the film to be held in a spherical cup.

Process lenses were probably the best-corrected for producing a relatively flat focal plane and that was done by having them produce a focal "plane" based on a very large sphere to minimize the issue.

Digital will have the same problem but it will have a different set of criteria and so a lens designed for film might well not work as well on digital, though Leica is marketing their later lenses as compatible with both and I have not heard of any specific problems with the longer lenses (say, 28mm and above) when used in both film and digital cameras.

Bear in mind that I unsubscribed from the Leica Users' Group a year or so back, so there might have been a discussion over there of which I am unaware.

Marc


msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!

---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: