Is this similar to what Leica did with the old Leicaflex Std, where it was very bright, but only allowed true precise focus via a microprism center ring? I could only see focus with that one by using the 90mm... P.J. Nebergall On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:03:24 -0500 Marc James Small <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Bright Screens are Bright Screens, and the=20 > technology for them is not new. To be blunt, you=20 > pay for brightness by sacrificing=20 > sharpness. This is not, as Eric suggested, a=20 > hypothetical matter, but rather it is a matter long koown. > > Me? I have bad eyes, nd so I go to sharpness=20 > over brightness. I have more problem focusing=20 > with my 2.8GX than with my 2.8F, but, then, I use them both > regularly. > > Marc > > > msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Cha robh b=E0s fir gun ghr=E0s fir! > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into > www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > > --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list