[rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification

  • From: Dennis Purdy <dlp4777@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:43:04 -0700

I had Harry do the 12/24, 220 conversion button on mine and it works fine but I think he told me he was nearly out of some of the necessary parts. I see from time to time a 12/24 transport part sold on ebay. I wonder if that is all that is necessary. In any case there are two ways of doing it and you don't actually need to install the 12/24 button, you can have a little switch installed up by the strap instead,
Dennis
On Jun 29, 2008, at 07:17, Masumi Yamamuro wrote:

<x-tad-bigger> I know I am kid of a lazy guy.</x-tad-bigger>

<x-tad-bigger>When I shoot mediaum format, I prefere using 220 films. It is just becase I do not have to change rolls very often, especially when I am using slide films with a lot of bracketings. I take a lot of street photos. It is a little awkward to change rolls on the street frequently.</x-tad-bigger>

<x-tad-bigger>My 2.8F does not take 220 films. </x-tad-bigger>

<x-tad-bigger>I found on Mr. Harry Fleenor's web site that he does 120/220 modification. </x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>www.rolleirepairs.com/220mod.html</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> This sounds good for a lazy guy like me.</x-tad-bigger>

<x-tad-bigger>Has anybody had this modification? Any opinions about pros and cons?</x-tad-bigger>

<x-tad-bigger>Thanks, in advance, for help me deciding. </x-tad-bigger>

<x-tad-bigger>マイクロソフトの最新次世代ブラウザ</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>IE7</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>に</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>MSN</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>版ならではの便利な機能をプラス</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> </x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>http://promotion.msn.co.jp/ie7/</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> </x-tad-bigger>

Other related posts: