That is painfull
Sent from BlueMail
On Jan 10, 2018, 11:53, at 11:53, Kenneth Brown <ken@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I expect that the Russians and Chinese know a lot more about the launch
than what we will find out about it.
Ken Brown
On Jan 10, 2018, at 9:04 AM, Richard Dierking wrote:
Good to hear that the roadster will not be ‘driving us’ to war. Sowhen found by some other civilization they are going to see a cool ride
and wonder why we sent this into space. They will not come across the
info on the Voyagers but will find this. LOL. They’ll be amazed at the
electrical car and wonder why we didn’t use a gasoline engine because
it works so much better.
looks CG. And, saw some more info on the news last night about the
I’ve seen that video though the link that James sent. So weird it
latest SpaceX launch. This is also pretty weird and smells so bad of
misinformation. They can’t even divulge how much the satellite cost
but can say it failed and landed in the Indian Ocean? I think it would
be worth it just to release info that a new stealth satellite has been
deployed and have Russia and China wondering where it was. Yeah, lots
more productive and even entertaining.
wrote:
Richard Dierking
On Jan 9, 2018, at 7:26 PM, James Dougherty <jafrado@xxxxxxxxx>
SM-3 tech
Hey Richard, I suspect there is some 10 year evolution of MKV-L &
<applerocketry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:into miniaturized space-based launch stations ..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kfvRDn1uVI
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Richard Dierking
think the first Falcon 9 to orbit wasn’t a scientific payload. StillTrue about maiden flights using boilerplates (mass simulators). I
think the F9H could have incorporated some kind of scientific payload.
Lots of university engineering teams would jump at the chance. And,
how about reentry test designs?
North Korea.It’s cool. It’s his company. Hopefully the car won’t reenter over
wrote:
Richard Dierking
On Jan 9, 2018, at 1:43 PM, Kenneth Brown <ken@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
weekend? I don’t track social media; has anyone heard anything from
5 or 6 years ago there were F9H launches on the VAFB schedule.
On Jan 9, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Richard Dierking wrote:
So, no news yet from David Reese about attending the launch this
David recently?
topic seem to be fine now days), I saw the release that the spy
Speaking of news (because multiple topic posts and going way off
satellite mission launch on Sunday failed. I wonder about these kinds
of press releases for secret missions. Like, hey North Korea and Iran,
don’t worry about what’s up there, because it fell in the ocean. Hum…
was thinking that Allen might be at the launch because of the space
Anyway, does the Falcon Heavy schedule seem to be going well? I
clock project payload. I can’t wait to see video of that launch and
the 3 boosters returning. At least I think they are landing all of
them this time - and not on a barge. Correct?
Vandenberg. That would be worth a road trip, even if when there’s a
Also, wondering if Falcon Heavy launches are possible from
risk of delay or scrub.
Richard Dierking
--
ROC-Chat mailing list
roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
//www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat
--
ROC-Chat mailing list
roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
//www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat
--
ROC-Chat mailing list
roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
//www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat
--
ROC-Chat mailing list
roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
//www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat
