So true ...
Good watch on MKV evolution.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2fXChvE6WQ
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Kenneth Brown <ken@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I expect that the Russians and Chinese know a lot more about the launch
than what we will find out about it.
Ken Brown
On Jan 10, 2018, at 9:04 AM, Richard Dierking wrote:
Good to hear that the roadster will not be ‘driving us’ to war. So whenfound by some other civilization they are going to see a cool ride and
wonder why we sent this into space. They will not come across the info on
the Voyagers but will find this. LOL. They’ll be amazed at the electrical
car and wonder why we didn’t use a gasoline engine because it works so much
better.
CG. And, saw some more info on the news last night about the latest SpaceX
I’ve seen that video though the link that James sent. So weird it looks
launch. This is also pretty weird and smells so bad of misinformation.
They can’t even divulge how much the satellite cost but can say it failed
and landed in the Indian Ocean? I think it would be worth it just to
release info that a new stealth satellite has been deployed and have Russia
and China wondering where it was. Yeah, lots more productive and even
entertaining.
tech
Richard Dierking
On Jan 9, 2018, at 7:26 PM, James Dougherty <jafrado@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey Richard, I suspect there is some 10 year evolution of MKV-L & SM-3
applerocketry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:into miniaturized space-based launch stations ..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kfvRDn1uVI
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Richard Dierking <
think the first Falcon 9 to orbit wasn’t a scientific payload. Still thinkTrue about maiden flights using boilerplates (mass simulators). I
the F9H could have incorporated some kind of scientific payload. Lots of
university engineering teams would jump at the chance. And, how about
reentry test designs?
North Korea.It’s cool. It’s his company. Hopefully the car won’t reenter over
weekend? I don’t track social media; has anyone heard anything from David
Richard Dierking
On Jan 9, 2018, at 1:43 PM, Kenneth Brown <ken@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
5 or 6 years ago there were F9H launches on the VAFB schedule.
On Jan 9, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Richard Dierking wrote:
So, no news yet from David Reese about attending the launch this
recently?
topic seem to be fine now days), I saw the release that the spy satellite
Speaking of news (because multiple topic posts and going way off
mission launch on Sunday failed. I wonder about these kinds of press
releases for secret missions. Like, hey North Korea and Iran, don’t worry
about what’s up there, because it fell in the ocean. Hum…
thinking that Allen might be at the launch because of the space clock
Anyway, does the Falcon Heavy schedule seem to be going well? I was
project payload. I can’t wait to see video of that launch and the 3
boosters returning. At least I think they are landing all of them this
time - and not on a barge. Correct?
Vandenberg. That would be worth a road trip, even if when there’s a risk
Also, wondering if Falcon Heavy launches are possible from
of delay or scrub.
Richard Dierking
--
ROC-Chat mailing list
roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
//www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat
--
ROC-Chat mailing list
roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
//www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat
--
ROC-Chat mailing list
roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
//www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat
--
ROC-Chat mailing list
roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
//www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat
